> This is addressed to developers in general, not just rgrimes, but he
> made the comments, so ...
:-)
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:33:44AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > It seems that the Phabricator review system is somewhat dysfunctional
> > in that actual review is only happening in
2018-03-30 11:04 GMT+08:00 Mark Linimon :
> This is addressed to developers in general, not just rgrimes, but he
> made the comments, so ...
>
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:33:44AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > It seems that the Phabricator review system is somewhat
This is addressed to developers in general, not just rgrimes, but he
made the comments, so ...
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:33:44AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> It seems that the Phabricator review system is somewhat dysfunctional
> in that actual review is only happening in some cases. Some
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 09:33:44AM -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> ...
> It seems that the Phabricator review system is somewhat disfunctional
> in that actual review is only happening in some cases. Some people
> have even stated they flat out hate it. Others say that it is the
> way to go.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 1:39 PM, Ian Lepore wrote:
> On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 09:33 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 06:20 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Author: araujo
> > > > > Date: Thu Mar 29 04:51:07 2018
>
On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 09:33 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 06:20 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Author: araujo
> > > > Date: Thu Mar 29 04:51:07 2018
> > > > New Revision: 331728
> > > > URL:
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:45 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Thursday, March 29, 2018 09:33:44 AM Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 06:20 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > > That's not a blocker for committing; plenty of time elapsed to allow
> > > anyone to
On Thursday, March 29, 2018 09:33:44 AM Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 06:20 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > That's not a blocker for committing; plenty of time elapsed to allow
> > anyone to reject the change. IMO, even a flat-out rejection isn't a
> > blocker to committing
> On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 06:20 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > >
> > > Author: araujo
> > > Date: Thu Mar 29 04:51:07 2018
> > > New Revision: 331728
> > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331728
> > >
> > > Log:
> > > ? MFC r329817:
> > I must of missed this when it landed in
On Thu, 2018-03-29 at 06:20 -0700, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> >
> > Author: araujo
> > Date: Thu Mar 29 04:51:07 2018
> > New Revision: 331728
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331728
> >
> > Log:
> > MFC r329817:
> I must of missed this when it landed in ^/head
>
> >
> >
On Thu, Mar 29, 2018, 9:20 PM Rodney W. Grimes <
free...@pdx.rh.cn85.dnsmgr.net> wrote:
> > Author: araujo
> > Date: Thu Mar 29 04:51:07 2018
> > New Revision: 331728
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331728
> >
> > Log:
> > MFC r329817:
>
> I must of missed this when it landed
> Author: araujo
> Date: Thu Mar 29 04:51:07 2018
> New Revision: 331728
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331728
>
> Log:
> MFC r329817:
I must of missed this when it landed in ^/head
> The firewall_type is ignored if not set in rc.conf or rc.conf.local,
> after r190575
Author: araujo
Date: Thu Mar 29 04:51:07 2018
New Revision: 331728
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/331728
Log:
MFC r329817:
The firewall_type is ignored if not set in rc.conf or rc.conf.local,
after r190575 there is an option to call rc.firewall with the firewall_type
13 matches
Mail list logo