Bruce,
On Sun, Feb 17, 2019 at 02:58:43AM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
B> This is only a rollback for the vnode pager pbufs sub-pool. Total
B> resource usage (preallocated kva and maximum on RAM that can be mapped
B> into this kva) is still about 5/2 times higher than before in my
B>
On Sat, Feb 16, 2019, 10:08 AM Ian Lepore On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 02:58 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Slowness is relative. In FreeBSD-1, floppy disk devices were still in
> > use and were especially slow. Now hard disks are slow relative to fast
> > SSDs. But the number of buffers was
On Sun, 2019-02-17 at 02:58 +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> Slowness is relative. In FreeBSD-1, floppy disk devices were still in
> use and were especially slow. Now hard disks are slow relative to fast
> SSDs. But the number of buffers was unchanged. It is still essentially
> unchanged except for
On Fri, 15 Feb 2019, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
Log:
For 32-bit machines rollback the default number of vnode pager pbufs
back to the lever before r343030. For 64-bit machines reduce it slightly,
too. Together with r343030 I bumped the limit up to the value we use at
Netflix to serve 100
Hi Gleb!
> On Feb 15, 2019, at 15:36, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
>
> Author: glebius
> Date: Fri Feb 15 23:36:22 2019
> New Revision: 344188
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344188
>
> Log:
> For 32-bit machines rollback the default number of vnode pager pbufs
> back to the lever
Author: glebius
Date: Fri Feb 15 23:36:22 2019
New Revision: 344188
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/344188
Log:
For 32-bit machines rollback the default number of vnode pager pbufs
back to the lever before r343030. For 64-bit machines reduce it slightly,
too. Together with
