Re: svn commit: r268543 - in head/sys: dev/drm2 dev/drm2/i915 dev/drm2/radeon dev/etherswitch/arswitch dev/etherswitch/rtl8366 dev/iicbus sys

2014-07-12 Thread Ian Lepore
On Fri, 2014-07-11 at 18:48 -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
 On Jul 11, 2014, at 18:42, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:
 
  On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 01:04 +, Rui Paulo wrote:
  Author: rpaulo
  Date: Sat Jul 12 01:04:10 2014
  New Revision: 268543
  URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268543
  
  Log:
   Move iic.h to sys/ so that it's automatically installed in 
  /usr/include/sys.
  
   This lets us call iic(4) ioctls without needing the kernel source code
   and follows the same model of GPIO.
  
   MFC after:3 weeks
  
  It was already available in /usr/include/dev/iicbus, and now it's not
  going to be, potentially breaking out-of-tree stuff.  Hrm... in fact
  definitely breaking it, we have references to dev/iicbus/iic.h in our
  apps at $work.
 
 Hmm.  In that case, which one is correct?  Should sys/gpio.h exist?
 
 --
 Rui Paulo
 

sys/gpio.h feels out of place to me -- it's device stuff, it should live
in include/dev/gpio.  Moving it now might create the same sort of
trouble for out-of-tree code, unless we also put a symlink in the old
location.

-- Ian

___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: svn commit: r268543 - in head/sys: dev/drm2 dev/drm2/i915 dev/drm2/radeon dev/etherswitch/arswitch dev/etherswitch/rtl8366 dev/iicbus sys

2014-07-11 Thread Ian Lepore
On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 01:04 +, Rui Paulo wrote:
 Author: rpaulo
 Date: Sat Jul 12 01:04:10 2014
 New Revision: 268543
 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268543
 
 Log:
   Move iic.h to sys/ so that it's automatically installed in /usr/include/sys.
   
   This lets us call iic(4) ioctls without needing the kernel source code
   and follows the same model of GPIO.
   
   MFC after:  3 weeks

It was already available in /usr/include/dev/iicbus, and now it's not
going to be, potentially breaking out-of-tree stuff.  Hrm... in fact
definitely breaking it, we have references to dev/iicbus/iic.h in our
apps at $work.

-- Ian


___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org


Re: svn commit: r268543 - in head/sys: dev/drm2 dev/drm2/i915 dev/drm2/radeon dev/etherswitch/arswitch dev/etherswitch/rtl8366 dev/iicbus sys

2014-07-11 Thread Rui Paulo
On Jul 11, 2014, at 18:42, Ian Lepore i...@freebsd.org wrote:

 On Sat, 2014-07-12 at 01:04 +, Rui Paulo wrote:
 Author: rpaulo
 Date: Sat Jul 12 01:04:10 2014
 New Revision: 268543
 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/268543
 
 Log:
  Move iic.h to sys/ so that it's automatically installed in /usr/include/sys.
 
  This lets us call iic(4) ioctls without needing the kernel source code
  and follows the same model of GPIO.
 
  MFC after:  3 weeks
 
 It was already available in /usr/include/dev/iicbus, and now it's not
 going to be, potentially breaking out-of-tree stuff.  Hrm... in fact
 definitely breaking it, we have references to dev/iicbus/iic.h in our
 apps at $work.

Hmm.  In that case, which one is correct?  Should sys/gpio.h exist?

--
Rui Paulo



___
svn-src-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to svn-src-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org