svn commit: r364257 - head/sys/net

2020-08-15 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Sat Aug 15 16:48:58 2020 New Revision: 364257 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/364257 Log: Correct the mask byte order when checking for reserved bits. Reviewed by: gnn Approved by: gnn MFC after:2 weeks Differential Revision:

Re: svn commit: r301217 - in head/sys: net netinet netinet6

2016-06-06 Thread Qing Li
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 11:06 PM, Alexander V. Chernikov < melif...@freebsd.org> wrote: > 06.06.2016, 04:40, "George Neville-Neil" : > > On 4 Jun 2016, at 15:05, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > > > >> 02.06.2016, 20:51, "George V. Neville-Neil" : > >>> Author:

svn commit: r252184 - head/sys/net

2013-06-24 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Tue Jun 25 00:10:49 2013 New Revision: 252184 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/252184 Log: Due to the routing related networking kernel redesign work in FBSD 8.0, interface routes have been returened to the applications without the RTF_GATEWAY bit. This

svn commit: r252141 - head/sys/netinet6

2013-06-23 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Mon Jun 24 05:01:13 2013 New Revision: 252141 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/252141 Log: Delete the nd6 entries associated with an off-link prefix if the same prefix cannot be found on an alternative interface. Reviewed by: hrs MFC after:1

Re: svn commit: r233773 - head/usr.sbin/arp

2012-04-09 Thread Qing Li
for an alternative patch ? --Qing 2012/4/8 Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org:  Qing, On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:41:11AM -0700, Qing Li wrote: Q This is not the right way to support RFC3021. Q Q The code you removed is used for checking against attempt at adding Q duplicate entry. Q Both

Re: svn commit: r233773 - head/usr.sbin/arp

2012-04-08 Thread Qing Li
This is not the right way to support RFC3021. The code you removed is used for checking against attempt at adding duplicate entry. Both the message and the code apply in that context. I tried to state clearly and concisely what r201282 was intended in solving and was verified by actual users who

Re: svn commit: r227791 - head/sys/netinet

2011-11-23 Thread Qing Li
 first I'd like to notice that we are speaking about obsoleted interfaces. Yup, that's why you don't see me commenting on your other commits around ia_netmask stuff, do you ? snip Back to your comments: I have made a test case that proves, that usage of deleted address isn't prevented

Re: svn commit: r227791 - head/sys/netinet

2011-11-21 Thread Qing Li
Logically speaking the prefix route should not be removed until all of the address related housing keeping tasks have been completed successfully. Putting in_scrubprefix() at the top does not gain you anything at all, but can potentially be problematic if additional tasks are in fact performed in

Re: svn commit: r227791 - head/sys/netinet

2011-11-21 Thread Qing Li
From my point of view logically speaking, we should first remove route, then remove address. Otherwise, for a short time we've got an invalid route in table. For a short time you have an invalid address, it is faster to remove the address from the list to prevent usage, then to flush the

svn commit: r227460 - head/sys/netinet6

2011-11-11 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Fri Nov 11 23:22:38 2011 New Revision: 227460 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/227460 Log: A default route learned from the RAs could be deleted manually after its installation. This removal may be accidental and can prevent the default route from being

svn commit: r226710 - head/sys/net

2011-10-24 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Tue Oct 25 00:34:39 2011 New Revision: 226710 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226710 Log: The host-id/interface-id can have a specific value and is properly masked out when adding a prefix route through the route command. However, when deleting the route,

svn commit: r226713 - head/sys/netinet

2011-10-24 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Tue Oct 25 04:06:29 2011 New Revision: 226713 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226713 Log: Exclude host routes when checking for prefix coverage on multiple interfaces. A host route has a NULL mask so check for that condition. I have also been told by

svn commit: r226451 - head/sys/netinet6

2011-10-16 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Sun Oct 16 22:15:13 2011 New Revision: 226451 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226451 Log: The IPv6 code was influx at the time of r196865 due to the L2/L3 separation rewrite changes. r196865 was committed to fix a scope violation problem in the following test

Re: svn commit: r225947 - head/sys/netinet

2011-10-10 Thread Qing Li
Okay, now I know what's confusing you ... it's that bug I introduced :-) The 2nd if() check on the RTF_GATEWAY flag should have been an else if(). In a nutshell, the logic is any indirect route should fail the check, except for that special host route. Attached is the rework of that part of the

svn commit: r226224 - head/sys/netinet

2011-10-10 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Mon Oct 10 17:41:11 2011 New Revision: 226224 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226224 Log: All indirect routes will fail the rtcheck, except for a special host route where the destination IP and the gateway IP is the same. This special case handling is only

Re: svn commit: r226224 - head/sys/netinet

2011-10-10 Thread Qing Li
MFC 225946 is the original patch, 225947 messed up the logic a bit while putting in the fix for another issue. 226224 is the fix to 225947, which I will MFC tomorrow. --Qing 2011/10/10 Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org:  Qing, On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 05:41:11PM +, Qing Li wrote: Q

Re: svn commit: r225947 - head/sys/netinet

2011-10-09 Thread Qing Li
Hi Gleb, On Mon, Oct 03, 2011 at 07:51:19PM +, Qing Li wrote: Q Author: qingli Q Date: Mon Oct  3 19:51:18 2011 Q New Revision: 225947 Q URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225947 Q Q Log: Q   A system may have multiple physical interfaces, all of which are on the Q   same

svn commit: r226114 - head/sys/netinet

2011-10-07 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Fri Oct 7 18:01:34 2011 New Revision: 226114 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226114 Log: Remove the reference held on the loopback route when the interface address is being deleted. Only the last reference holder deletes the loopback route. All other delete

svn commit: r226120 - head/sys/netinet

2011-10-07 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Fri Oct 7 22:22:19 2011 New Revision: 226120 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226120 Log: Do not try removing an ARP entry associated with a given interface address if that interface does not support ARP. Otherwise the system will generate error messages

svn commit: r226040 - head/sys/netinet6

2011-10-05 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Wed Oct 5 16:27:11 2011 New Revision: 226040 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226040 Log: The IFA_RTSELF instead of the IFA_ROUTE flag should be checked to determine if a loopback route should be installed for an interface IPv6 address. Another condition is

Re: svn commit: r226040 - head/sys/netinet6

2011-10-05 Thread Qing Li
, Oct 5, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-li...@lists.zabbadoz.net wrote: On 5. Oct 2011, at 16:27 , Qing Li wrote: Author: qingli Date: Wed Oct  5 16:27:11 2011 New Revision: 226040 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/226040 Log:  The IFA_RTSELF instead of the IFA_ROUTE flag

svn commit: r225946 - head/sys/netinet

2011-10-03 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Mon Oct 3 19:06:55 2011 New Revision: 225946 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225946 Log: This patch allows ARP to work properly in the presence of self-referencing routes. This patch is a rework of r223862. Reviewed by: bz, zec MFC after:5 days

svn commit: r225947 - head/sys/netinet

2011-10-03 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Mon Oct 3 19:51:18 2011 New Revision: 225947 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225947 Log: A system may have multiple physical interfaces, all of which are on the same prefix. Since a single route entry is installed for the prefix (without RADIX_MPATH),

svn commit: r225405 - head/sys/dev/ixgbe

2011-09-05 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Mon Sep 5 17:54:19 2011 New Revision: 225405 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225405 Log: The maximum read size of incoming packets is done in 1024-byte increments. The current code was rounding down the maximum frame size instead of routing up, resulting in

svn commit: r225223 - head/sys/netinet

2011-08-27 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Sun Aug 28 00:14:40 2011 New Revision: 225223 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225223 Log: When an interface address route is removed from the system, another route with the same prefix is searched for as a replacement. The current code did not bypass routes

svn commit: r225163 - head/sys/net

2011-08-24 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Thu Aug 25 04:31:20 2011 New Revision: 225163 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/225163 Log: When the RADIX_MPATH kernel option is enabled, the RADIX_MPATH code tries to find the first route node of an ECMP chain before executing the route command. If the system

svn commit: r222438 - head/sys/netinet

2011-05-28 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Sun May 29 02:21:35 2011 New Revision: 222438 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222438 Log: Supply the LLE_STATIC flag bit to in_ifscurb() when scrubbing interface address so that proper clean up will take place in the routing code. This patch fixes the bootp

svn commit: r222143 - in head/sys: net netinet netinet6

2011-05-20 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Fri May 20 19:12:20 2011 New Revision: 222143 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/222143 Log: The statically configured (permanent) ARP entries are removed when an interface is brought down, even though the interface address is still valid. This patch maintains

svn commit: r212502 - head/sys/netinet

2010-09-12 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Sun Sep 12 18:04:47 2010 New Revision: 212502 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/212502 Log: Adding an address on an interface also requires the loopback route to that address be installed. PR: kern/150481 Submitted by: Ingo Flaschberger if at

svn commit: r208553 - in head/sys: net netinet

2010-05-25 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Tue May 25 20:42:35 2010 New Revision: 208553 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/208553 Log: This patch fixes the problem where proxy ARP entries cannot be added over the if_ng interface. MFC after:3 days Modified: head/sys/net/if.c

svn commit: r205268 - head/sys/dev/mii

2010-03-17 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Wed Mar 17 22:12:12 2010 New Revision: 205268 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205268 Log: Set the device capabilities to include dynamic link-state for those modern drivers. Reviewed by: imp (and suggested by imp) MFC after:3 days Modified:

svn commit: r205272 - head/usr.sbin/ppp

2010-03-17 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Thu Mar 18 00:23:39 2010 New Revision: 205272 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205272 Log: Need to set the proper flag bit when inserting ARP entries into the kernel. MFC after:3 days Modified: head/usr.sbin/ppp/arp.c Modified:

svn commit: r205222 - in head: sbin/ifconfig sys/net

2010-03-16 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Tue Mar 16 17:59:12 2010 New Revision: 205222 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205222 Log: Verify interface up status using its link state only if the interface has such capability. The interface capability flag indicates whether such capability exists. This

Re: svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net

2010-03-12 Thread Qing Li
Nope, I meant Julian, and what he proposed, and if I understood correctly, is the simplest approach and easily done. -- Qing On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 12:29 AM, Robert N. M. Watson rwat...@freebsd.org wrote: On Mar 12, 2010, at 8:11 AM, Qing Li wrote: I like Julian's suggestion because

svn commit: r205077 - head/sys/net

2010-03-12 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Fri Mar 12 10:24:58 2010 New Revision: 205077 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205077 Log: The flow-table module retrieves the destination and source address as well as the transport protocol port information from the outbound packets. The routing code is

Re: svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net

2010-03-12 Thread Qing Li
We've got LINK_STATE_UNKNOWN, we can just initialize if_link_state to this value in ether_ifattach(). And Qing should treat this value as LINK_STATE_UP in routing decision until better times. Thanks everyone for your input. I generally try to avoid overloading a variable to have more than 1

svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net

2010-03-11 Thread Qing Li
Author: qingli Date: Thu Mar 11 17:56:46 2010 New Revision: 205024 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/205024 Log: The if_tap interface is of IFT_ETHERNET type, but it does not set or update the if_link_state variable. As such RT_LINK_IS_UP() fails for the if_tap interface.

Re: svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net

2010-03-11 Thread Qing Li
A couple of questions: (1) It used to be the case that quite a few interface drivers and types didn't have a notion of link up -- especially older ethernet devices.  Do those all have the same problem?  It was probably a design oversight that  devices don't declare an explicit capability for

Re: svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net

2010-03-11 Thread Qing Li
On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:35 PM, Juli Mallett jmall...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 15:30, Qing Li qin...@freebsd.org wrote: A couple of questions: (1) It used to be the case that quite a few interface drivers and types didn't have a notion of link up -- especially older ethernet

Re: svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net

2010-03-11 Thread Qing Li
If you can think of a way to add some invariants (warn the first time a driver receives a packet without having ever set the link state, make sure the media status callback sets the valid flag in the request, etc) that would probably be very helpful for people who are writing network

Re: svn commit: r205024 - head/sys/net

2010-03-11 Thread Qing Li
That's a good idea. I will take your approach. -- Qing On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Julian Elischer jul...@elischer.org wrote: Juli Mallett wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 15:39, Qing Li qin...@freebsd.org wrote: I guess it's a good time to clean things up. The if_link_state code has

Re: svn commit: r204902 - in head/sys: net netinet

2010-03-10 Thread Qing Li
I looked at it, and at the diff of his original commit.  The changes were large enough that I don't want to assume his patch takes care of all the issues given that patch hasn't been committed verbatim. The change itself is not a huge change but if you disagree, then please be specific. The