Re: Introduce WITH(OUT)_LTO? (was: Re: svn commit: r362987 - in head: contrib/bc usr.bin/gh-bc) (LLVMgold.so and gnu's ld.gold)

2020-08-03 Thread Mark Millard via svn-src-head
On 2020-Jul-25, at 13:59, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2020-Jul-8, at 01:28, Stefan Eßer wrote: > >> Am 08.07.20 um 09:01 schrieb Mark Millard: >>> The following is more informational than anything as far >>> as I'm concerned. But there may be implications that I'm >>> unaware of. (I sometimes

Re: Introduce WITH(OUT)_LTO? (was: Re: svn commit: r362987 - in head: contrib/bc usr.bin/gh-bc) (LLVMgold.so and gnu's ld.gold)

2020-07-25 Thread Mark Millard via svn-src-head
On 2020-Jul-8, at 01:28, Stefan Eßer wrote: > Am 08.07.20 um 09:01 schrieb Mark Millard: >> The following is more informational than anything as far >> as I'm concerned. But there may be implications that I'm >> unaware of. (I sometimes experiment with toolchain use >> to see what the current

Re: Introduce WITH(OUT)_LTO? (was: Re: svn commit: r362987 - in head: contrib/bc usr.bin/gh-bc)

2020-07-08 Thread Mark Millard via svn-src-head
On 2020-Jul-8, at 01:28, Stefan Eßer wrote: > Am 08.07.20 um 09:01 schrieb Mark Millard: >> The following is more informational than anything as far >> as I'm concerned. But there may be implications that I'm >> unaware of. (I sometimes experiment with toolchain use >> to see what the current

Introduce WITH(OUT)_LTO? (was: Re: svn commit: r362987 - in head: contrib/bc usr.bin/gh-bc)

2020-07-08 Thread Stefan Eßer
Am 08.07.20 um 09:01 schrieb Mark Millard: > The following is more informational than anything as far > as I'm concerned. But there may be implications that I'm > unaware of. (I sometimes experiment with toolchain use > to see what the current status is for such use.) > > I attempted to build a