On 7/16/18 11:27 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2018-Jul-1, at 6:34 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> My brain finally engaged for showing exactly what files are included
>> for the gcc builds: the .meta files include that information explicitly
>> (along with other files that are opened during the
On 2018-Jul-1, at 6:34 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> My brain finally engaged for showing exactly what files are included
> for the gcc builds: the .meta files include that information explicitly
> (along with other files that are opened during the operation).
>
> amd64 is as I reported, just one
My brain finally engaged for showing exactly what files are included
for the gcc builds: the .meta files include that information explicitly
(along with other files that are opened during the operation).
amd64 is as I reported, just one header file from gcc: float.h .
powerpc64 builds
On 2018-Jun-30, at 11:53 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 6/30/18 10:19 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-Jun-30, at 10:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On 2018-Jun-30, at 9:29 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/30/18 9:17 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
On 2018-Jun-30, at 7:51 AM, John
On 6/30/18 10:19 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>
> On 2018-Jun-30, at 10:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On 2018-Jun-30, at 9:29 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/30/18 9:17 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
On 2018-Jun-30, at 7:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 6/29/18 2:37 PM, Mark Millard
On 2018-Jun-30, at 10:04 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2018-Jun-30, at 9:29 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 6/30/18 9:17 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> On 2018-Jun-30, at 7:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>
On 6/29/18 2:37 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [I expect this is more than just
On 2018-Jun-30, at 9:29 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 6/30/18 9:17 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2018-Jun-30, at 7:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>>> On 6/29/18 2:37 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
[I expect this is more than just amd64-gcc related but that is all
that ci.freebsd.org normally
On 6/30/18 9:17 AM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2018-Jun-30, at 7:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 6/29/18 2:37 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> [I expect this is more than just amd64-gcc related but that is all
>>> that ci.freebsd.org normally builds via a devel/*-gcc .]
>>
>> As indicated by my
On 2018-Jun-30, at 7:51 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 6/29/18 2:37 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>> [I expect this is more than just amd64-gcc related but that is all
>> that ci.freebsd.org normally builds via a devel/*-gcc .]
>
> As indicated by my other mail, this is i386 and amd64 specific as it
>
On 6/29/18 2:37 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [I expect this is more than just amd64-gcc related but that is all
> that ci.freebsd.org normally builds via a devel/*-gcc .]
As indicated by my other mail, this is i386 and amd64 specific as it
only matters for float.h on i386 due to the disagreement on
[Re-sending from my subscription address, sorry for the spam]
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 1:26 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 6/28/18 7:54 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2018-Jun-28, at 6:04 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-Jun-28, at 5:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>>
[ ci.free.bsd.org
On 2018-Jun-29, at 2:37 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [I expect this is more than just amd64-gcc related but that is all
> that ci.freebsd.org normally builds via a devel/*-gcc .]
>
> On 2018-Jun-29, at 10:38 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>
>> On 6/28/18 7:54 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> On 2018-Jun-28,
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 1:26 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 6/28/18 7:54 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2018-Jun-28, at 6:04 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-Jun-28, at 5:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>>
[ ci.free.bsd.org jumped from -r335773 (built) to -r335784 (failed)
for
[I expect this is more than just amd64-gcc related but that is all
that ci.freebsd.org normally builds via a devel/*-gcc .]
On 2018-Jun-29, at 10:38 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 6/28/18 7:54 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>> On 2018-Jun-28, at 6:04 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-Jun-28, at
On 6/28/18 7:54 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2018-Jun-28, at 6:04 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On 2018-Jun-28, at 5:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> [ ci.free.bsd.org jumped from -r335773 (built) to -r335784 (failed)
>>> for FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc. It looked to me like the most likely
>>>
On 6/28/18 7:54 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2018-Jun-28, at 6:04 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> On 2018-Jun-28, at 5:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>>
>>> [ ci.free.bsd.org jumped from -r335773 (built) to -r335784 (failed)
>>> for FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc. It looked to me like the most likely
>>>
On 2018-Jun-28, at 6:04 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> On 2018-Jun-28, at 5:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
>
>> [ ci.free.bsd.org jumped from -r335773 (built) to -r335784 (failed)
>> for FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc. It looked to me like the most likely
>> breaking-change was the following but I've not tried
On 2018-Jun-28, at 5:39 PM, Mark Millard wrote:
> [ ci.free.bsd.org jumped from -r335773 (built) to -r335784 (failed)
> for FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc. It looked to me like the most likely
> breaking-change was the following but I've not tried personal
> builds to confirm.
> ]
>
> It looks to me
[ ci.free.bsd.org jumped from -r335773 (built) to -r335784 (failed)
for FreeBSD-head-amd64-gcc. It looked to me like the most likely
breaking-change was the following but I've not tried personal
builds to confirm.
]
It looks to me that:
> Author: jhb
> Date: Thu Jun 28 21:26:14 2018
> New
19 matches
Mail list logo
