On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Bruce Evans
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
...
Oops. ?I think sizeof() and issigned() can be used
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 10:27 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Bruce Evans
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
SYSCTL_I() works even better that I first thought. ?It automatically
gives support for all typedefed integral types. ?No SYSCTL_FOO_T()s
...
Grrr, my sentence breaks of 2
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 6:55 AM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
The printing is done entirely in user-space, so it's not too bad. I
had figured to upcast everything
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
There appear to be 330 uses of SYSCTL and QUAD on the same line in
CURRENT. This seems reasonable to change them to S64, U64 and X64 so
they correctly reflect the size they
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
There appear to be 330 uses of SYSCTL and QUAD on the same line in
CURRENT. ?This seems reasonable to change them to S64, U64 and
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
There appear to be 330 uses of SYSCTL and QUAD on the
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 9:56 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
Now with stricter type checking, even formats for integers are redundant.
The CTLTYPE now always matches the type, and the format should always
match the type. ?The space wasted
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Garrett Cooper wrote:
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 6:42 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:50 PM, Bruce Evans b...@optusnet.com.au
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
There
Author: mdf
Date: Thu Jan 13 18:20:33 2011
New Revision: 217369
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/217369
Log:
Add a 64-bit hex-printed sysctl(9) since there is at least one place in
the code that wanted it. It is named X64 rather than XQUAD since the
quad name is a historical
There appear to be 330 uses of SYSCTL and QUAD on the same line in
CURRENT. This seems reasonable to change them to S64, U64 and X64 so
they correctly reflect the size they operate upon.
What do y'all think?
Thanks,
matthew
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Matthew D Fleming m...@freebsd.org
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011, Matthew D Fleming wrote:
Log:
Add a 64-bit hex-printed sysctl(9) since there is at least one place in
the code that wanted it. It is named X64 rather than XQUAD since the
quad name is a historical abomination that should not be perpetuated.
:-). It is only long long
On Thu, 13 Jan 2011 m...@freebsd.org wrote:
There appear to be 330 uses of SYSCTL and QUAD on the same line in
CURRENT. This seems reasonable to change them to S64, U64 and X64 so
they correctly reflect the size they operate upon.
What do y'all think?
Now I suggest delaying this until they
14 matches
Mail list logo
