Qing,
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 02:26:06PM -0700, Qing Li wrote:
Q You missed my points.
Q
Q That if check as part of r201282 was meant to resolve a couple of
Q issues related
Q to PPP links, as noted in my commit message. In this PPP/proxy
Q resolution context
Q the error message applies, which
Qing,
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 10:41:11AM -0700, Qing Li wrote:
Q This is not the right way to support RFC3021.
Q
Q The code you removed is used for checking against attempt at adding
Q duplicate entry.
Q Both the message and the code apply in that context. I tried to state
Q clearly and
You missed my points.
That if check as part of r201282 was meant to resolve a couple of
issues related
to PPP links, as noted in my commit message. In this PPP/proxy
resolution context
the error message applies, which is why I actually used the word context in my
previous reply.
Your removing of
This is not the right way to support RFC3021.
The code you removed is used for checking against attempt at adding
duplicate entry.
Both the message and the code apply in that context. I tried to state
clearly and concisely
what r201282 was intended in solving and was verified by actual users
who
Author: glebius
Date: Mon Apr 2 10:44:25 2012
New Revision: 233773
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/233773
Log:
Historically arp(8) did a route lookup for the entry it is
about to add, and failed if it exist and had invalid data
link type.
Later on, in r201282, this check
