On 30 May 2012, at 09:01, Marius Strobl wrote:
Ehm, yes, but given that this wouldn't be the first such flag we have
is avoiding it really worth the link time and run time overheads in
the long term?
Given the small overhead of the extra hashes, yes. At some point in the
future, we can
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 10:00:02AM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 30 May 2012, at 09:01, Marius Strobl wrote:
Ehm, yes, but given that this wouldn't be the first such flag we have
is avoiding it really worth the link time and run time overheads in
the long term?
Given the small
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:47:28PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:03:55PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 05:27:48AM +, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Author: kib
Date: Sun May 27 05:27:47 2012
New Revision: 236137
URL:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 12:48:33AM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 11:47:28PM +0300, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:03:55PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 05:27:48AM +, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Author: kib
Date:
On 28 May 2012, at 20:33, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On the other hand, it's really platform-dependent: I've checked several
Linux distributions, and it is fairly unpredictable whether their gcc
passes --hash-style to the linker, or if they do, which option they use.
Can we make it dependent on
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:03:55PM +0200, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 05:27:48AM +, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Author: kib
Date: Sun May 27 05:27:47 2012
New Revision: 236137
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/236137
Log:
Enable gnu hash generation
On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 09:17:23PM +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
On 28 May 2012, at 20:33, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On the other hand, it's really platform-dependent: I've checked several
Linux distributions, and it is fairly unpredictable whether their gcc
passes --hash-style to the linker,
On 2012-05-28 22:17, David Chisnall wrote:
On 28 May 2012, at 20:33, Dimitry Andric wrote:
On the other hand, it's really platform-dependent: I've checked several
Linux distributions, and it is fairly unpredictable whether their gcc
passes --hash-style to the linker, or if they do, which
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 05:27:48AM +, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
Author: kib
Date: Sun May 27 05:27:47 2012
New Revision: 236137
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/236137
Log:
Enable gnu hash generation for dynamic ELF binaries on x86.
As far as I remember from your
On 2012-05-27 22:31, Roman Divacky wrote:
Fwiw, to enable the same thing in clang you want this simple patch:
===
--- Tools.cpp (revision 157545)
+++ Tools.cpp (working copy)
@@ -4794,6 +4794,7 @@
if
Fwiw, to enable the same thing in clang you want this simple patch:
===
--- Tools.cpp (revision 157545)
+++ Tools.cpp (working copy)
@@ -4794,6 +4794,7 @@
if (Args.hasArg(options::OPT_static)) {
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 10:31:00PM +0200, Roman Divacky wrote:
Fwiw, to enable the same thing in clang you want this simple patch:
===
--- Tools.cpp (revision 157545)
+++ Tools.cpp (working copy)
@@ -4794,6 +4794,7 @@
Author: kib
Date: Sun May 27 05:27:47 2012
New Revision: 236137
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/236137
Log:
Enable gnu hash generation for dynamic ELF binaries on x86.
Reviewed by: kan
Modified:
head/contrib/gcc/config/i386/freebsd.h
13 matches
Mail list logo
