...@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 1:56:03 PM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r240427 - head/sys/dev/virtio
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:40:42 pm Bryan Venteicher wrote:
Would it be possible to use atomic_load/store() instead of direct
memory barriers? For example
On Friday, September 14, 2012 3:55:20 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:47:52AM -0500, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
I also found myself wanting an atomic_load_rel_*() type function.
That would be odd I think. _rel barriers only affect stores, so
there would be no
, September 14, 2012 7:17:54 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r240427 - head/sys/dev/virtio
On Friday, September 14, 2012 3:55:20 am Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:47:52AM -0500, Bryan Venteicher wrote:
I also found myself wanting an atomic_load_rel_*() type
function
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:36:47 pm Peter Grehan wrote:
Author: grehan
Date: Thu Sep 13 00:36:46 2012
New Revision: 240427
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240427
Log:
Relax requirement of certain mb()s
Submitted by: Bryan Venteicher bryanv at
Hi,
- Original Message -
From: John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org
To: Peter Grehan gre...@freebsd.org
Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-...@freebsd.org,
src-committ...@freebsd.org
Sent: Thursday, September 13, 2012 7:59:38 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r240427 - head/sys/dev/virtio
, 2012 7:59:38 AM
Subject: Re: svn commit: r240427 - head/sys/dev/virtio
On Wednesday, September 12, 2012 8:36:47 pm Peter Grehan wrote:
Author: grehan
Date: Thu Sep 13 00:36:46 2012
New Revision: 240427
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240427
Log:
Relax
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:40:42 pm Bryan Venteicher wrote:
Would it be possible to use atomic_load/store() instead of direct
memory barriers? For example:
I've been sitting on a (lightly tested) patch [1] for awhile that
does just that, but am not very happy with it. A lot of
: Re: svn commit: r240427 - head/sys/dev/virtio
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 12:40:42 pm Bryan Venteicher wrote:
Would it be possible to use atomic_load/store() instead of direct
memory barriers? For example:
I've been sitting on a (lightly tested) patch [1] for awhile that
does
Author: grehan
Date: Thu Sep 13 00:36:46 2012
New Revision: 240427
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/240427
Log:
Relax requirement of certain mb()s
Submitted by: Bryan Venteicher bryanv at daemoninthecloset org
Modified:
head/sys/dev/virtio/virtqueue.c
Modified: