svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread David E. O'Brien
Author: obrien Date: Fri Aug 9 16:43:50 2013 New Revision: 254150 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/254150 Log: Add missing 'VPO_BUSY' from r254141 to fix kernel build break. Modified: head/sys/vm/vm_page.h Modified: head/sys/vm/vm_page.h

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, August 09, 2013 12:43:50 pm David E. O'Brien wrote: Author: obrien Date: Fri Aug 9 16:43:50 2013 New Revision: 254150 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/254150 Log: Add missing 'VPO_BUSY' from r254141 to fix kernel build break. Modified: head/sys/vm/vm_page.h

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread John Baldwin
On Friday, August 09, 2013 4:34:36 pm Alan Cox wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at 12:56 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, August 09, 2013 12:43:50 pm David E. O'Brien wrote: Author: obrien Date: Fri Aug 9 16:43:50 2013 New Revision: 254150 URL:

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread Alan Cox
On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Alan Cox wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at 12:56 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, August 09, 2013 12:43:50 pm David E. O'Brien wrote: Author: obrien Date: Fri Aug 9 16:43:50 2013 New Revision: 254150 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/254150 Log:

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread Alan Cox
On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:39 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, August 09, 2013 4:34:36 pm Alan Cox wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at 12:56 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, August 09, 2013 12:43:50 pm David E. O'Brien wrote: Author: obrien Date: Fri Aug 9 16:43:50 2013 New Revision: 254150 URL:

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread Alan Cox
On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:45 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, August 09, 2013 4:40:10 pm Alan Cox wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at 1:34 PM, Alan Cox wrote: On Aug 9, 2013, at 12:56 PM, John Baldwin wrote: On Friday, August 09, 2013 12:43:50 pm David E. O'Brien wrote: Author: obrien Date: Fri

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
... ? Can we please back it all out and then re-test attilio's patch with alan's fix, before committing it all again? I kinda have a vested interest at ${WORK} to be able to test -10 HEAD right now for all these performance investigations and fixes that need to happen for us; having the VM

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread alc
Quoting Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org: ... ? Can we please back it all out and then re-test attilio's patch with alan's fix, before committing it all again? John is doing a sanity check on my patch. He'll commit it shortly. So, I don't think that we need to go as far as backing

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread Peter Wemm
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: ... ? Can we please back it all out and then re-test attilio's patch with alan's fix, before committing it all again? I kinda have a vested interest at ${WORK} to be able to test -10 HEAD right now for all these

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread Adrian Chadd
No, we should upgrade the cluster, watch it fail, and then let people experience their own handiwork. Sheesh. :( -adrian On 9 August 2013 14:19, Peter Wemm pe...@wemm.org wrote: On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:13 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: ... ? Can we please back it all out and

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread Scott Long
Yes, at least some of this stuff is coming to light because we're aggressively tracking top-of-tree in both 9 and 10. Which is good. But highly annoying at times. But good in the long run. It means that 9.2 won't suck, and 10.0 won't suck. =-) Scott On Aug 9, 2013, at 3:22 PM, Adrian Chadd

Re: svn commit: r254150 - head/sys/vm

2013-08-09 Thread Peter Wemm
On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: No, we should upgrade the cluster, watch it fail, and then let people experience their own handiwork. It could turn out a bit like this: