Rebased, but that is not the first time. What it really needs is reviews.
On 17.11.2016 14:22, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Thanks, looks like the PR needs a rebase before it can be merged.
>
> On 17/11/2016 22:11, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> It is in OpenZFS review queue now:
>>
Thanks, looks like the PR needs a rebase before it can be merged.
On 17/11/2016 22:11, Alexander Motin wrote:
It is in OpenZFS review queue now:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/219 Welcome to comment there to
speed up the process.
On 17.11.2016 13:43, Steven Hartland wrote:
Is this
It is in OpenZFS review queue now:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/219 Welcome to comment there to
speed up the process.
On 17.11.2016 13:43, Steven Hartland wrote:
> Is this something that should be upstreamed?
>
> On 17/11/2016 21:01, Alexander Motin wrote:
>> Author: mav
>> Date: Thu
Is this something that should be upstreamed?
On 17/11/2016 21:01, Alexander Motin wrote:
Author: mav
Date: Thu Nov 17 21:01:27 2016
New Revision: 308782
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/308782
Log:
After some ZIL changes 6 years ago zil_slog_limit got partially broken
due
Author: mav
Date: Thu Nov 17 21:01:27 2016
New Revision: 308782
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/308782
Log:
After some ZIL changes 6 years ago zil_slog_limit got partially broken
due to zl_itx_list_sz not updated when async itx'es upgraded to sync.
Actually because of other
