on 11/11/2010 21:37 Dimitry Andric said the following:
> On 2010-11-11 20:29, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Do I understand it correctly that set_pcpu section itself would not be
>> produced if
>> DPCPU_DEFINE() is not actually used?
>
> Yes, although currently this does not occur in any kernel module (I
On 2010-11-11 20:29, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Do I understand it correctly that set_pcpu section itself would not be produced
if
DPCPU_DEFINE() is not actually used?
Yes, although currently this does not occur in any kernel module (I
tested using make universe). But indeed, if you would include e.
on 11/11/2010 21:18 Dimitry Andric said the following:
> Author: dim
> Date: Thu Nov 11 19:18:52 2010
> New Revision: 215138
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215138
>
> Log:
> Use the same treatment as in linker_set.h for the __start and __stop
> symbols of the set_vnet and set_pcp
Author: dim
Date: Thu Nov 11 19:18:52 2010
New Revision: 215138
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/215138
Log:
Use the same treatment as in linker_set.h for the __start and __stop
symbols of the set_vnet and set_pcpu sections, so those symbols will
always be emitted in kernel modules
