Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-19 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: G On (16/01/2012 09:53), Gleb Smirnoff wrote: G Author: glebius G Date: Mon Jan 16 09:53:24 2012 G New Revision: 230207 G URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230207 G G Log: GDrop support for SIOCSIFADDR,

Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-19 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (16/01/2012 09:53), Gleb Smirnoff wrote: Author: glebius Date: Mon Jan 16 09:53:24 2012 New Revision: 230207 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230207 Log: Drop support for SIOCSIFADDR, SIOCSIFNETMASK, SIOCSIFBRDADDR, SIOCSIFDSTADDR ioctl commands. What was the reason for

Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-19 Thread Ivan Voras
2012/1/19 Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org: Do you use them? Or do you know software that use them? That's easy: Google: SIOCSIFADDR About 55,400 results A different question is if any *important* software uses it... ___ svn-src-head@freebsd.org

Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-19 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (19/01/2012 18:51), Gleb Smirnoff wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 04:38:38PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: G On (16/01/2012 09:53), Gleb Smirnoff wrote: G Author: glebius G Date: Mon Jan 16 09:53:24 2012 G New Revision: 230207 G URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230207 G G

Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-19 Thread Mark Linimon
I had kind of hoped that before support was dropped, we had generated a strategy for dealing with the port breakages that my -exp run detected. This is disappointing. mcl ___ svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list

Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-19 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:46:27PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: G I wouldn't claim compatibility for the commands that didn't work very well. G I won't also name Linux, since these commands predate the Linux itself. G G I meant that SIOCSIFADDR is default (if not the only) way to set G interface

Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-19 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 11:07:55AM -0600, Mark Linimon wrote: M I had kind of hoped that before support was dropped, we had generated M a strategy for dealing with the port breakages that my -exp run detected. M This is disappointing. These three ports were false positives. They do not utilize

Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-19 Thread Ben Kaduk
On 1/19/12, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote: On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 06:46:27PM +0200, Gleb Kurtsou wrote: G It's not a big deal for me, I have no problem with replacing them on G FreeBSD. FreeBSD is not even officially supported platform for the G product and I build/test on FreeBSD

Re: svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-19 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Ben, On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 03:12:27PM -0500, Ben Kaduk wrote: B G It's not a big deal for me, I have no problem with replacing them on B G FreeBSD. FreeBSD is not even officially supported platform for the B G product and I build/test on FreeBSD solely for the purpose of avoiding B G

svn commit: r230207 - in head/sys: netinet sys

2012-01-16 Thread Gleb Smirnoff
Author: glebius Date: Mon Jan 16 09:53:24 2012 New Revision: 230207 URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230207 Log: Drop support for SIOCSIFADDR, SIOCSIFNETMASK, SIOCSIFBRDADDR, SIOCSIFDSTADDR ioctl commands. PR: 163524 Reviewed by: net Modified: