On 26 October 2012 21:16, Rui Paulo rpa...@felyko.com wrote:
I second Adrian's comments and I would like to add that you must NOT commit
something like this, breaking the ABI, when you discussed this *ONE YEAR* ago
with only two people (one of them is not very active in the networking
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 09:16:08PM -0700, Rui Paulo wrote:
R I second Adrian's comments and I would like to add that you must NOT commit
something like this, breaking the ABI, when you discussed this *ONE YEAR* ago
with only two people (one of them is not very active in the networking stack).
So with this change, you've broken building -HEAD net80211 on -9.
Can we please sit down and make this work on both freebsd-9 and
freebsd-head? I do a lot of wifi development on -9 with -HEAD wireless
and this change broke everything for me.
You could've at least asked the maintainers first
I second Adrian's comments and I would like to add that you must NOT commit
something like this, breaking the ABI, when you discussed this *ONE YEAR* ago
with only two people (one of them is not very active in the networking stack).
This is against all reasonable software development practices.
Author: glebius
Date: Tue Oct 16 13:37:54 2012
New Revision: 241610
URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/241610
Log:
Make the struct if_clone opaque to users of the cloning API. Users
now use function calls:
if_clone_simple()
if_clone_advanced()
to initialize a cloner,
