Author: glebius
Date: Wed Mar 12 14:29:08 2014
New Revision: 263091
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/263091
Log:
Since both netinet/ and netinet6/ call into netipsec/ and netpfil/,
the protocol specific mbuf flags are shared between them.
- Move all M_FOO definitions into a
Will this work for non inet6 builds?
Adrian
On Mar 12, 2014 7:29 AM, Gleb Smirnoff gleb...@freebsd.org wrote:
Author: glebius
Date: Wed Mar 12 14:29:08 2014
New Revision: 263091
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/263091
Log:
Since both netinet/ and netinet6/ call into
On 12.03.2014 18:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
--- head/sys/netinet/ip_input.c Wed Mar 12 12:27:13 2014
(r263090)
+++ head/sys/netinet/ip_input.c Wed Mar 12 14:29:08 2014
(r263091)
@@ -794,6 +795,8 @@ SYSCTL_PROC(_net_inet_ip, OID_AUTO, maxf
NULL, 0,
Gleb Smirnoff wrote this message on Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 14:29 +:
Author: glebius
Date: Wed Mar 12 14:29:08 2014
New Revision: 263091
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/263091
Log:
Since both netinet/ and netinet6/ call into netipsec/ and netpfil/,
the protocol specific
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 03:19:55PM -0700, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
J Log:
JSince both netinet/ and netinet6/ call into netipsec/ and netpfil/,
Jthe protocol specific mbuf flags are shared between them.
J
J- Move all M_FOO definitions into a single place: netinet/in6.h, to
J
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 01:09:15AM +0400, Andrey Chernov wrote:
A On 12.03.2014 18:29, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
A --- head/sys/netinet/ip_input.cWed Mar 12 12:27:13 2014
(r263090)
A +++ head/sys/netinet/ip_input.cWed Mar 12 14:29:08 2014
(r263091)
A @@ -794,6 +795,8 @@
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:58:10PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote:
A Will this work for non inet6 builds?
Of course it works.
--
Totus tuus, Glebius.
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-src-head
To