Thanks!
Yes, that was clearly an error on my part, and your patch is an obvious
solution. I committed it at r307336.
Thanks again!
Jonathan
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Shawn Webb
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:16:42AM +, Jonathan T. Looney wrote:
> >
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:16:42AM +, Jonathan T. Looney wrote:
> Author: jtl
> Date: Wed Oct 12 02:16:42 2016
> New Revision: 307082
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/307082
>
> Log:
> In the TCP stack, the hhook(9) framework provides hooks for kernel modules
> to add
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 5:44 AM, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> Do you perform estimate of performane impact of this overhead?
>
>
Somewhat, but not precisely. It will depend on (at least) a few factors:
a. The hardware
* How fast is your CPU? Your L1/L2/L3 cache?
* How many
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 02:16:42AM +, Jonathan T. Looney wrote:
> Author: jtl
> Date: Wed Oct 12 02:16:42 2016
> New Revision: 307082
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/307082
>
> Log:
> In the TCP stack, the hhook(9) framework provides hooks for kernel modules
> to add