Re: svn commit: r325785 - in head: sys/kern tools/tools/sysdoc

2017-11-14 Thread Warner Losh
As implemented today, the power cycle shutdown handler has a higher priority than the power off handlers. So, if you have IPMI enabled, the power cylce will take precedence and that will happen. If not (or the IPMI fails to power off within the timeout period), then the power off will happen.

Re: svn commit: r325785 - in head: sys/kern tools/tools/sysdoc

2017-11-14 Thread Ronald Klop
Just out of curiosity. What happens if you enable both? Regards, Ronald. On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:29:14 +0100, Warner Losh wrote: Author: imp Date: Tue Nov 14 00:29:14 2017 New Revision: 325785 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/325785 Log: Add two new

svn commit: r325785 - in head: sys/kern tools/tools/sysdoc

2017-11-13 Thread Warner Losh
Author: imp Date: Tue Nov 14 00:29:14 2017 New Revision: 325785 URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/325785 Log: Add two new tunables / sysctls to controll reboot after panic: kern.poweroff_on_panic which, when enabled, instructs a system to power off on a panic instead of a