As implemented today, the power cycle shutdown handler has a higher
priority than the power off handlers. So, if you have IPMI enabled, the
power cylce will take precedence and that will happen. If not (or the IPMI
fails to power off within the timeout period), then the power off will
happen.
Just out of curiosity. What happens if you enable both?
Regards,
Ronald.
On Tue, 14 Nov 2017 01:29:14 +0100, Warner Losh wrote:
Author: imp
Date: Tue Nov 14 00:29:14 2017
New Revision: 325785
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/325785
Log:
Add two new
Author: imp
Date: Tue Nov 14 00:29:14 2017
New Revision: 325785
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/325785
Log:
Add two new tunables / sysctls to controll reboot after panic:
kern.poweroff_on_panic which, when enabled, instructs a system to
power off on a panic instead of a