On 21 September 2018 at 16:11, Xin Li wrote:
> On 9/21/18 10:49, Ed Maste wrote:
>> Author: emaste
>> Date: Fri Sep 21 17:49:37 2018
>> New Revision: 338861
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/338861
>>
>> Log:
>> libc: require ifunc-capable linker for amd64/i386
>>
>
> It seems
On 21 September 2018 at 16:11, Xin Li wrote:
> On 9/21/18 10:49, Ed Maste wrote:
>> Author: emaste
>> Date: Fri Sep 21 17:49:37 2018
>> New Revision: 338861
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/338861
>>
>> Log:
>> libc: require ifunc-capable linker for amd64/i386
>>
>> We expect
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 01:11:46PM -0700, Xin Li wrote:
> On 9/21/18 10:49, Ed Maste wrote:
> > Author: emaste
> > Date: Fri Sep 21 17:49:37 2018
> > New Revision: 338861
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/338861
> >
> > Log:
> > libc: require ifunc-capable linker for amd64/i386
On 9/21/18 10:49, Ed Maste wrote:
> Author: emaste
> Date: Fri Sep 21 17:49:37 2018
> New Revision: 338861
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/338861
>
> Log:
> libc: require ifunc-capable linker for amd64/i386
>
> We expect to introduce optimized libc routines in the near
On 21 September 2018 at 14:11, Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> Should this require bumping __FreeBSD_version?
Shouldn't be necessary - as of r336901 we've had an ifunc-capable
linker in the toolchain for both amd64 and i386. This commit is just a
safety belt to make sure that if someone builds libc
In message <201809211749.w8lhnbap091...@repo.freebsd.org>, Ed Maste
writes:
> Author: emaste
> Date: Fri Sep 21 17:49:37 2018
> New Revision: 338861
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/338861
>
> Log:
> libc: require ifunc-capable linker for amd64/i386
>
> We expect to
Author: emaste
Date: Fri Sep 21 17:49:37 2018
New Revision: 338861
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/338861
Log:
libc: require ifunc-capable linker for amd64/i386
We expect to introduce optimized libc routines in the near future,
which requires use of a linker that supports