On Fri, 13 Sep 2019 at 08:00, Bruce Evans wrote:
>
> C11 removed gets(), but POSIX.1-2017 (Issue 7) still has it (marked as
> obsolescent). Thus this change breaks support for all versions of POSIX.
Yes, and intentionally so. If there is a compelling reason to restore
it I'll add the #ifdef-ery
On Sun, 1 Sep 2019, Cy Schubert wrote:
I'm replying to this reply since I lost the original mail.
In message <201909011612.x81gc5dw097...@repo.freebsd.org>, Ed Maste writes:
Author: emaste
Date: Sun Sep 1 16:12:05 2019
New Revision: 351659
URL:
On 01/09/2019 22:36, Cy Schubert wrote:
In message
, Conrad Meyer writes:
Hi Cy,
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:23 PM Cy Schubert wrote:
In message
c
om>
, Conrad Meyer writes:
Short version: no, we shouldn't [recommend the use of gets_s]. :-)
Longer version: Annex K functions like gets_s
In message
, Conrad Meyer writes:
> Hi Cy,
>
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:23 PM Cy Schubert wrote:
> >
> > In message c
> > om>
> > , Conrad Meyer writes:
> >
> > > Short version: no, we shouldn't [recommend the use of gets_s]. :-)
> > >
> > > Longer version: Annex K functions like gets_s have
Hi Cy,
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:23 PM Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> In message om>
> , Conrad Meyer writes:
>
> > Short version: no, we shouldn't [recommend the use of gets_s]. :-)
> >
> > Longer version: Annex K functions like gets_s have zero real adoption
> > (Microsoft's APIs that inspired Annex
In message
, Conrad Meyer writes:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 12:32 PM Cy Schubert wrote
> :
> > In message <201909011612.x81gc5dw097...@repo.freebsd.org>, Ed Maste writes:
> > > Author: emaste
> > > Date: Sun Sep 1 16:12:05 2019
> > > New Revision: 351659
> > > URL:
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 12:32 PM Cy Schubert wrote:
> In message <201909011612.x81gc5dw097...@repo.freebsd.org>, Ed Maste writes:
> > Author: emaste
> > Date: Sun Sep 1 16:12:05 2019
> > New Revision: 351659
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351659
> >
> > Log:
> > libc: remove
Sorry. Accidentally hit send instead of clicking in the edit box.
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 2:12 PM Conrad Meyer wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 12:32 PM Cy Schubert wrote:
> >
> > In message <201909011612.x81gc5dw097...@repo.freebsd.org>, Ed Maste writes:
> > > Author: emaste
> > > Date: Sun
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 12:32 PM Cy Schubert wrote:
>
> In message <201909011612.x81gc5dw097...@repo.freebsd.org>, Ed Maste writes:
> > Author: emaste
> > Date: Sun Sep 1 16:12:05 2019
> > New Revision: 351659
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351659
> >
> > Log:
> > libc:
On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 9:12 AM Ed Maste wrote:
>
> Author: emaste
> Date: Sun Sep 1 16:12:05 2019
> New Revision: 351659
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351659
>
> Log:
> libc: remove gets
>
> gets is unsafe and shouldn't be used (for many years now). Leave it in
> the
On Sun, Sep 01, 2019 at 12:32:34PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote:
> This probably requires a __FreeBSD_version bump.
Since it affects FreeBSD ports, yes, please.
mcl
___
svn-src-head@freebsd.org mailing list
In message <201909011612.x81gc5dw097...@repo.freebsd.org>, Ed Maste writes:
> Author: emaste
> Date: Sun Sep 1 16:12:05 2019
> New Revision: 351659
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351659
>
> Log:
> libc: remove gets
>
> gets is unsafe and shouldn't be used (for many years
Author: emaste
Date: Sun Sep 1 16:12:05 2019
New Revision: 351659
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/351659
Log:
libc: remove gets
gets is unsafe and shouldn't be used (for many years now). Leave it in
the existing symbol version so anything that previously linked aginst it
13 matches
Mail list logo