On 1 Jul 2020, at 00:03, Stefan Eßer wrote:
>
> Am 30.06.20 um 23:29 schrieb Dimitry Andric:
...
>> This is because you are supposed to commit stuff to ^/base/vendor/xxx
>> first, then svn cp it to ^/head/contrib/xxx, at least from Subversion
>> 1.8 onwards. The 'cp' action establishes the
Am 30.06.20 um 23:29 schrieb Dimitry Andric:
> On 30 Jun 2020, at 22:01, Stefan Eßer wrote:
>>
>> Am 29.06.20 um 20:09 schrieb Ed Maste:
>>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:27, John Baldwin wrote:
I suspect just doing the 'merge --record-only' is the simplest method
assuming Git
On 30 Jun 2020, at 22:01, Stefan Eßer wrote:
>
> Am 29.06.20 um 20:09 schrieb Ed Maste:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:27, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>
>>> I suspect just doing the 'merge --record-only' is the simplest method
>>> assuming Git handles it ok. I suspect since Git ignores mergeinfo this
Am 29.06.20 um 20:09 schrieb Ed Maste:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:27, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> I suspect just doing the 'merge --record-only' is the simplest method
>> assuming Git handles it ok. I suspect since Git ignores mergeinfo this
>> is fine, but it would be good for Ed to confirm.
On 29/06/2020 16:11, Stefan Eßer wrote:
Am 29.06.20 um 20:09 schrieb Ed Maste:
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:27, John Baldwin wrote:
I suspect just doing the 'merge --record-only' is the simplest method
assuming Git handles it ok. I suspect since Git ignores mergeinfo this
is fine, but it would
On 6/29/20 2:11 PM, Stefan Eßer wrote:
> Am 29.06.20 um 20:09 schrieb Ed Maste:
>> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:27, John Baldwin wrote:
>>>
>>> I suspect just doing the 'merge --record-only' is the simplest method
>>> assuming Git handles it ok. I suspect since Git ignores mergeinfo this
>>> is
Am 29.06.20 um 20:09 schrieb Ed Maste:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:27, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> I suspect just doing the 'merge --record-only' is the simplest method
>> assuming Git handles it ok. I suspect since Git ignores mergeinfo this
>> is fine, but it would be good for Ed to confirm.
On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 11:27, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> I suspect just doing the 'merge --record-only' is the simplest method
> assuming Git handles it ok. I suspect since Git ignores mergeinfo this
> is fine, but it would be good for Ed to confirm. You can always restore
> the tests in the
On 6/28/20 1:28 AM, Stefan Eßer wrote:
> I could delete what's currently in contrib/bc and use svn copy to make
> the whole contents of vendor/bc/dist available in contrib/bc. The tests
> require 1112 KB of space, while the rest of the sources takes up less
> than 900 KB.
>
> I could revert the
Am 27.06.20 um 23:52 schrieb Eric van Gyzen:
> On 6/27/20 8:11 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On 6/27/20 5:02 AM, Stefan Eßer wrote:
>>> Author: se
>>> Date: Sat Jun 27 12:02:01 2020
>>> New Revision: 362681
>>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362681
>>>
>>> Log:
>>> Import new
On 6/27/20 8:11 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On 6/27/20 5:02 AM, Stefan Eßer wrote:
Author: se
Date: Sat Jun 27 12:02:01 2020
New Revision: 362681
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362681
Log:
Import new 2-clause BSD licenced implementation of the bc and dc commands
Hmm, I didn't
On 6/27/20 5:02 AM, Stefan Eßer wrote:
> Author: se
> Date: Sat Jun 27 12:02:01 2020
> New Revision: 362681
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362681
>
> Log:
> Import new 2-clause BSD licenced implementation of the bc and dc commands
Hmm, I didn't see a commit to add the vendor
Author: se
Date: Sat Jun 27 12:02:01 2020
New Revision: 362681
URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/362681
Log:
Import new 2-clause BSD licenced implementation of the bc and dc commands
These implementations of the bc and dc programs offer a number of advantages
compared to the
13 matches
Mail list logo
