On 9 April 2018 at 15:28, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> I do think we are likely to have far fewer conditional LDFLAGS rather
> than CFLAGS though. I think if we are only going to have 1 or 2
> instances in the tree then LDFLAGS.LINKER_TYPE might perhaps be
> overkill, but if we
On Monday, April 09, 2018 11:02:01 AM Warner Losh wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Ed Maste wrote:
>
> > On 6 April 2018 at 13:54, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Friday, April 06, 2018 02:57:58 AM Ed Maste wrote:
> > >> Author: emaste
> > >> Date:
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Ed Maste wrote:
> On 6 April 2018 at 13:54, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Friday, April 06, 2018 02:57:58 AM Ed Maste wrote:
> >> Author: emaste
> >> Date: Fri Apr 6 02:57:58 2018
> >> New Revision: 332090
> >> URL:
On 6 April 2018 at 13:54, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, April 06, 2018 02:57:58 AM Ed Maste wrote:
>> Author: emaste
>> Date: Fri Apr 6 02:57:58 2018
>> New Revision: 332090
>> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332090
>>
>> Log:
>> stand: pass --no-rosegment
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 11:54 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday, April 06, 2018 02:57:58 AM Ed Maste wrote:
> > Author: emaste
> > Date: Fri Apr 6 02:57:58 2018
> > New Revision: 332090
> > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332090
> >
> > Log:
> > stand: pass
On Friday, April 06, 2018 02:57:58 AM Ed Maste wrote:
> Author: emaste
> Date: Fri Apr 6 02:57:58 2018
> New Revision: 332090
> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/332090
>
> Log:
> stand: pass --no-rosegment for i386 bits when linking with lld
>
> btxld does not correctly