please do, if you create a PR then you get the proper credit for the fix when
we merge it
Sent using a virtual keyboard on a phone
> On Dec 19, 2022, at 13:51, antonio wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> The debian rule was not building the unit file, applying the following
> changes solves the issue:
New commits:
commit 1b045f874c596c8796db6ae0545cb0a2626b62e8
Author: Andrew Cagney
Date: Mon Dec 19 14:24:23 2022 -0500
kernel: eliminate shunt_policy_spi() hack
just convert shunt to %... directly
commit 391fd2f2c687debbda6aa490d4af5f8c3948cee2
Author: Andrew Cagney
Date: Mon
Hi Paul,
The debian rule was not building the unit file, applying the following changes
solves the issue:
diff --git a/packaging/debian/rules b/packaging/debian/rules
index 7b6a790cb7..522e902d91 100755
--- a/packaging/debian/rules
+++ b/packaging/debian/rules
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
New commits:
commit 3a980b30cfb6c908afd448a439cd8496d328a023
Author: Andrew Cagney
Date: Mon Dec 19 12:54:27 2022 -0500
ikev2: change "leaving TS alone" to a debug message
___
Swan-commit mailing list
Swan-commit@lists.libreswan.org
New commits:
commit ff648c4fbcfb3d7a9be49a9f03c6e276a3b3170c
Author: Andrew Cagney
Date: Mon Dec 19 08:02:12 2022 -0500
testing: expect 0 port when ICMP
commit e65a0da117b93554571938e6fb704dcf6a963e74
Author: Andrew Cagney
Date: Mon Dec 19 08:01:43 2022 -0500
ip: only supress 0
