Re: [Swan] Possible to setup multiple connections, partly behind NAT?

2024-02-16 Thread Paul Wouters via Swan
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024, Phil Nightowl wrote: conn headq left=%defaultroute leftcert=remotehost1 leftid=%fromcert right=198.51.100.33 rightid=%fromcert leftsubnet=0.0.0.0/0 rightsubnet=0.0.0.0/0 What are you trying to do here? Where does 0.0.0.0/0 live? It cannot live at both

Re: [Swan-dev] What does "missing v2CP reply" mean?

2024-02-16 Thread Tuomo Soini via Swan-dev
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 16:12:20 +0100 Brady Johnson via Swan-dev wrote: > I included the configuration in the original email, and it did not > include "narrowing", nor "leftmodecfgclient". I'll check if either of > those are set by default. My guess is that "dhcp" in NetworkManager configuration

Re: [Swan-dev] What does "missing v2CP reply" mean?

2024-02-16 Thread Brady Johnson via Swan-dev
I included the configuration in the original email, and it did not include "narrowing", nor "leftmodecfgclient". I'll check if either of those are set by default. Would it have been better to send this email to "Libreswan users"? Regards, *Brady Johnson* Principal Software Engineer Telco

Re: [Swan-dev] What does "missing v2CP reply" mean?

2024-02-16 Thread Paul Wouters via Swan-dev
On Fri, 16 Feb 2024, Brady Johnson via Swan-dev wrote: Subject: Re: [Swan-dev] What does "missing v2CP reply" mean? Would it be more helpful to enable debug logging? Or is there some other test that could be done to figure this out? It seems your peer has not been configured to hand out IP

Re: [Swan-dev] What does "missing v2CP reply" mean?

2024-02-16 Thread Brady Johnson via Swan-dev
Would it be more helpful to enable debug logging? Or is there some other test that could be done to figure this out? Regards, *Brady Johnson* Principal Software Engineer Telco Verification Ecosystems Engineering brady.john...@redhat.com On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:45 AM Andrew Cagney wrote: >

Re: [Swan] nic-offload, was Re: [External] : Re: Question on opportunistic ipsec for multiple interfaces on same subnet

2024-02-16 Thread Mamta Gambhir via Swan
I tried the same subnet case with out offloads and that works very cleanly. # ip x s s src 192.167.0.2 dst 192.167.0.3 proto esp spi 0xcdc36e21 reqid 16413 mode transport replay-window 0 flag esn aead rfc4106(gcm(aes))