On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Ilan Tayari wrote:
It's designed to be compatible anywhere ethtool -k works.
This was introduced around kernel 2.6.38, circa 2011
We do still have embedded people, and people on 2.4.x kernels. I think
it is safe to assume that if these detection routines fail, we go back
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Wouters [mailto:p...@nohats.ca]
> Subject: RE: [libreswan RFC 2/3] pluto, whack: Add nic-offload 'auto' mode
>
> On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Ilan Tayari wrote:
>
> >> For the second and the third patch here is my suggestion.
> >>
> >> no|yes|auto is probably
On Mon, 31 Jul 2017, Ilan Tayari wrote:
For the second and the third patch here is my suggestion.
no|yes|auto is probably better keywords in the libreswan context.
Libreswan do not use first letter capitalizing as you proposed.
Sure, no problem, I'll change in v2
I am not sure about
> -Original Message-
> From: Antony Antony [mailto:ant...@phenome.org]
> Subject: Re: [libreswan RFC 2/3] pluto, whack: Add nic-offload 'auto' mode
>
> Hi Ilan,
> Thanks for the patches.
>
> I reviewed the patches. May be Hugh can clarify the first one. I wonder
> the
> comment following
Hi Ilan,
Thanks for the patches.
I reviewed the patches. May be Hugh can clarify the first one. I wonder the
comment following that line need to be fix as well.
For the second and the third patch here is my suggestion.
no|yes|auto is probably better keywords in the libreswan context.
