RE: [SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review

2000-11-06 Thread Hugh Falk
That was it for me. -Original Message- From: Jim Leonard [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 8:08 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review "Lee K. Seitz" wrote: Jim Leonard boldly stated:

Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review

2000-11-06 Thread Lee K. Seitz
Jim Leonard boldly stated: 3. The IM and MMC modifiers are used when grading an entire package, although from the examples IM can be used as a separate "grade" when there's no item of which to state the condition. Uh, I don't understand what you mean by "IM can be used as a separate "grade"

Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review

2000-11-02 Thread C.E. Forman
Okay, you've convinced me. Makes sense. I do have to say, though... use BM when you know it because that condition affects the value to some collectors. [...] I guess the point of BM (and why I support it) [...] Ultimately, you can ignore BM if you don't think you'll never need/use it.

Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review

2000-11-01 Thread Lee K. Seitz
Jim Leonard boldly stated: Each grade can also have a modifier associated with it: - Sealed (S): Sealed with original factory (or store) shrinkwrap or sticker. - Compressed (C): Package has been crushed or compressed. - Torn Wrap (T): Sealed package has tears in the shrinkwrap. - Item

Re: [SWCollect] MobyScale 0.3.0 -- please review

2000-10-31 Thread Jim Leonard
"C.E. Forman" wrote: Looks great to me. No problem with the not-in-all-packages items, I can do without and it'd be less confusing anyway. Any last-minute changes, speak up now! I have no further changes... anyone else? -- http://www.MobyGames.com/ The world's most comprehensive