That's a very good point, and I'll change the wording of that for version
0.3.
Can I have your permission to quote sections of the above?
Of course.
--
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
Jim Leonard boldly stated:
The Official MobyGames Software Collectables Condition Grading Scale
Version 0.1
-
Background:
another wildly overused the term "MINT!", etc. This lack of standardization
can lead to confusion
Chris: I made sure to describe Factory-Sealed to include original
store-sealed
packages as well, to cover early sealed Infocom games that never had
*factory*
seals. (Just out of curiousity, were there other publishers as well that
relied on the store to do initial wraps?)
Not to my
Since you're asking, I really think you shouldn't have two conditions
with such similar names. I think it will lead to confusion. Perhaps
they should be FS, NM, VG, G, Fine, and Poor instead. (VG+ becomes
VG, VG become G, G becomes Fine, and drop the Fair off F/P.)
This is a good point,
