jon,
Robert Jonathan Molesa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 16:00:13 -0400):
> depending on you answer as to their interchangeability, how does
> swfmill decide when and how to apply the two image tags, and is there a
> default?
the primary difference between DefineBitsLossless an
Steve,
once again thank you for your insights. i can see now that this is
far to complicated of costs just to achieve something using a simple
process. My question is then if there is a significant difference to
using one tag over the other? Do they serve different purposes or can
they be us
Hi all !I have problems with textfield variable targeting... Here how is built the SWF :
- root- > MovieClip "anim"
- > MovieClip "tfHolder"- - > Dynamic textfield with no instance name
The textfield has his "Variable" porperty filled with 'anim.myVar' and the 'tfHolder' has these actionscript
Bug posted...On 4/21/06, Steve Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Quentin,> I know this has been posted before (see> http://osflash.org/pipermail/swfmill_osflash.org/2006-January/000361.html
)> but no answer was made...>> The thing is, I get a lot of these errors :>> > WARNING: unknown fill styl
I'll post that bug...On 4/21/06, Steve Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi erixtekila/mark,> On 4/21/06, Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > Here is what I did, according to what you suggested :> >> > Put together a FLA with only a dynamic textfield on the stage with an
> > instance name "tf">
Hi erixtekila/mark,
> On 4/21/06, Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here is what I did, according to what you suggested :
> >
> > Put together a FLA with only a dynamic textfield on the stage with an
> > instance name "tf"
> > Wrote an ActionScript class that simply sets the textfield content
Hi Quentin,
> I know this has been posted before (see
> http://osflash.org/pipermail/swfmill_osflash.org/2006-January/000361.html)
> but no answer was made...
>
> The thing is, I get a lot of these errors :
>
> > WARNING: unknown fill style type 0x74
> > WARNING: unknown fill style type 0x39
> > W
Hi list !I know this has been posted before (see http://osflash.org/pipermail/swfmill_osflash.org/2006-January/000361.html) but no answer was made...
The thing is, I get a lot of these errors :WARNING: unknown fill style type 0x74
WARNING: unknown fill style type 0x39WARNING: unknown fill style typ
On 4/21/06, Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here is what I did, according to what you suggested :
>
> Put together a FLA with only a dynamic textfield on the stage with an
> instance name "tf"
> Wrote an ActionScript class that simply sets the textfield content to 9.8
> Injected the code via M
Here is what I did, according to what you suggested :Put together a FLA with only a dynamic textfield on the stage with an instance name "tf"Wrote an ActionScript class that simply sets the textfield content to
9.8Injected the code via MTASCThe updated SWF works fine, the textfield displays 9.8.Th
Hi Robert,
> thanks Steve, that's exactly what I was running into. I had generated the
> base64 for an image and pasted that into an xml file's data child of the
> DefineBitsLossless2 tag and got a very strange looking image.
>
> is that to say that DefineBitsLossless2 is expecting binary repre
On 4/21/06, Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No, no quotes ! I sent a FLA on the Trac site, but if you are on Linux you
> might not be able to open it, but the only actionscript line in it is what I
> posted before ( tfVal.text = 9.8;) !
> The textfield was not created by actionscript, but with
Solved on IRC (#osflash @ freenode.net) -- class must be imported for
swfmill to call it. Compiling with mtasc later won't work.
Mark
On 4/21/06, erixtekila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Seems that method="main"/>
> is not implemented anymore.
>
> I've searched in th src xslt repositry
No, no quotes ! I sent a FLA on the Trac site, but if you are on Linux you might not be able to open it, but the only actionscript line in it is what I posted before (
tfVal.text = 9.8;) !The textfield was not created by actionscript, but within the IDE, maybe this is the difference that wreaks hav
On 4/21/06, Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the link !
> Sorry to bother, but how can you explain the SWF generated by the Flash IDE
> works fine, but the one rendered via swfmill has this floating point problem
> ?
The one generated by the IDE does *not* have this problem? I have
Hi erixtekila,
> I didn't find the way to use device fonts outline instead of embedded.
> Any idea ?
>
> Here is something that works.
> glyphs="version.0123456789 "/>
>
> text="version ${version_application}"/>
>
> that don't :
> text="version ${version_application}"/>
> nor font="_sans"
>
>
Thanks for the link !Sorry to bother, but how can you explain the SWF generated by the Flash IDE works fine, but the one rendered via swfmill has this floating point problem ?Cheers !
On 4/20/06, Mark Winterhalder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/20/06, Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> Hi !> I ha
17 matches
Mail list logo
