Yes, we *really* need a new release of SWFMill...
The version on SVN is a lot more advanced than the current release.
There are quite a few of us using swfmill on a daily basis and not all
people is capable of compiling from sources. Last time i tried in
Ubuntu i couldn't, can't even remember
Zárate,
if you like, I can send you my binary. Not sure if that would work,
but it might be worth a shot.
It's built on Gentoo for Pentium-M.
Mark
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Zárate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, we *really* need a new release of SWFMill...
The version on SVN is a
quoting Zárate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What about SWFMill 0.4??
0.3 is first ;)
for me, i wouldn't mind just promoting the current SVN to 0.3, to
communicate the steps and stability improvement it made recently.
thing is, my compile-to-windows setup broke and is not easily
recreatable. also, the
quoting Zárate [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yes, we *really* need a new release of SWFMill...
The version on SVN is a lot more advanced than the current release.
There are quite a few of us using swfmill on a daily basis and not all
people is capable of compiling from sources. Last time i tried in
Hello Daniel all,
I've spent 3 days recently to compile swfmill for windows, and I can
do it reliably now I think. The only problem is that it makes a 13mb
binary (and requiring libiconv-2.dll).. I can maybe even set up an
automatic builder, but first someone needs to point me how to
Hello Ralf,
I've finally managed to try the function of splitting an xml into
pieces I asked you to implement several months ago, and found a
problem: I can easily compile an swf from pieces but the resources
are not available.
The xmls look like:
root.xml
movie version=8
frame
Oh. Not the easy 2-second answer then...
I tried the include id=otherfile file=temp.xml / and clip
id=otherfile import=temp.xml / and neither worked. Are you doing
something like:
swfmill file1.xml file1.swf
swfmill file2.xml file2.swf
and then using both these in haXe as separate swf -lib
