Hi Ian, I don’t think Max has put up that PR against the swift-corelibs-foundation implementation, but we should.
- Tony > On Aug 9, 2017, at 9:04 AM, Ian Partridge via swift-corelibs-dev > <swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org> wrote: > > I've noticed this current difference in behaviour. > > Darwin: > > $ swift > Welcome to Apple Swift version 4.0-dev (LLVM 2dedb62a0b, Clang b9d76a314c, > Swift 6b4756bd93). Type :help for assistance. > 1> import Foundation > 2> "abc".range(of: "a")!.lowerBound..<"abc".range(of: "a")!.upperBound > $R0: Range<String.Index> = { > lowerBound = { > _compoundOffset = 0 > _cache = utf16 > } > upperBound = { > _compoundOffset = 4 > _cache = utf16 > } > } > > Linux: > > $ swift > Welcome to Swift version 4.0-dev (LLVM 2dedb62a0b, Clang b9d76a314c, Swift > 6b4756bd93). Type :help for assistance. > 1> import Foundation > 2> "abc".range(of: "a")!.lowerBound..<"abc".range(of: "a")!.upperBound > $R0: CountableRange<String.Index> = { > lowerBound = { > _compoundOffset = 0 > _cache = utf16 > } > upperBound = { > _compoundOffset = 4 > _cache = utf16 > } > } > > I think this might be because some changes made in the overlay > (NSStringAPI.swift) haven't been ported across to swift-corelibs-foundation: > > https://github.com/apple/swift/commit/5f1c3f702189f8197e297479d464dc454330be80 > > <https://github.com/apple/swift/commit/5f1c3f702189f8197e297479d464dc454330be80> > > Is my suspicion right, and is there any work in progress to bring this into > sync before Swift 4? > > -- > Ian Partridge > _______________________________________________ > swift-corelibs-dev mailing list > swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
_______________________________________________ swift-corelibs-dev mailing list swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev