Re: [swift-dev] Shipping sourcekitd-test/repl with Swift

Thanks for the context JP! Maybe we should circle back once that has been figured out then. -- Keith Smiley On 08/30, Jean-Pierre Simard wrote: > Before SourceKit-related functionality can be considered for inclusion in > release packages for Linux, it needs to be able to be built during "normal"

Re: [swift-dev] Shipping sourcekitd-test/repl with Swift

Before SourceKit-related functionality can be considered for inclusion in release packages for Linux, it needs to be able to be built during "normal" invocation of the build script. I say normal because it's possible to build SourceKit with two (simple) invocations of the build script at the moment

Re: [swift-dev] Shipping sourcekitd-test/repl with Swift

Sorry to bump this thread, just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this now that (some) of the Swift 3.0 craziness is done. -- Keith Smiley On Sun, Jul 31, 2016, at 21:46, Keith Smiley via swift-dev wrote: > Hey everyone, > > Recently I've been working on making Swift autocomplete outside

Re: [swift-dev] Swift incremental compile profiling

Thank you, Jordan! I had guessed there wouldn't be much low-hanging fruit here -- I'm sure a ton of work has been put into improving compilation time, after all. Thanks for all the great explanations. The one thing we *could* do here is improve -driver-show-incremental. I > haven’t used it in a w

[swift-dev] TWISt-shout Newsletter 2016-08-29

Here is your TWISt-shout Newsletter for the week of 2016-08-22 to 2016-08-28 https://github.com/pepperdog/TWISt-shout/blob/master/2016/TWISt-shout-2016-08-29.md Enjoy! -Kenny ___ swift-dev mailing list swift-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mail

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-users] New Swift Snapshots Available!

Are others finding that the necessary developer-installation signature is absent? I’m virtually certain that https://swift.org/builds/development/xcode/swift-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2016-08-25-a/swift-DEVELOPMENT-SNAPSHOT-2016-08-25-a-osx.pkg

Re: [swift-dev] Swift's handling of function types

> On Aug 27, 2016, at 9:28 AM, Jens Persson via swift-dev > wrote: > > IMHO Swift's handling of function types violate the principle of least > surprise. > > In the example program below, are `a` and `b` really of the same function > type? > > I searched but couldn't find any proposal or di