Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 15.10 (swift 3.0) #288

https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3110 [TEST] Dispatch Suspend Timer ... [BEGIN] tweedledee tick count Actual: 8 Expected: 7 [FAIL] tweedledee tick count (dispatch_suspend_timer.c:96) dispatch_suspend_timer.c:96 > On Nov 1, 2016, at 5:53 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE]

Re: [swift-dev] Continuation-based versus nested-function-based materializeForSet

> On Oct 31, 2016, at 12:22 PM, Joe Groff via swift-dev > wrote: > We currently abstract over mutable property accesses using what I’ll call a > continuation-based model–the materializeForSet accessor is called before an > inout access, and returns a continuation callback

Re: [swift-dev] Inability to leverage privacy in the stdlib

The problem is if a private type or function X is referenced from a function Y with a serialized body, then if Y is inlined inside of another module, it cannot see the symbol for X. The solution is to disable -sil-seiralize-all and replace it with an explicit ‘fragile’ attribute that is put on

Re: [swift-dev] [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 15.10 (swift 3.0) #142

Thanks! > On Nov 1, 2016, at 12:14 PM, Todd Fiala wrote: > > Comments in the bug. I have a candidate fix that I put in upstream in > LLVM.org LLDB svn trunk. > > I’ll pull that through after I get the current merge settled. > >> On Nov 1, 2016, at 11:21

Re: [swift-dev] Continuation-based versus nested-function-based materializeForSet

> On Nov 1, 2016, at 11:00 AM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > I like the idea; it makes more sense to me than our current model (which > feels more like a plain callback than a continuation to me). Some things that > occurred to me when reading this: > > - This seems like

Re: [swift-dev] Inability to leverage privacy in the stdlib

on Tue Nov 01 2016, Alexis wrote: > Hmm, I excitedly prototyped out refactoring HashedCollections to > properly use privacy and decent naming since I’m clobbering the whole > file with the new indexing stuff anyway. Unfortunately I hit a linker > error. I can’t seem to produce a reduced test

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 15.10 (swift 3.0) #142

https://bugs.swift.org/browse/SR-3103 > On Nov 1, 2016, at 11:17 AM, mishal_shah via swift-dev > wrote: > > FAIL: test_attach_to_process_by_name_dwarf > (functionalities/process_attach/TestProcessAttach.py) > > [TestProcessAttach.py FAILED] > Command invoked:

Re: [swift-dev] Inability to leverage privacy in the stdlib

I made a PR with some basic privacy usage for Array, and everything seems to be working on OSX, but not Linux. https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/5573 Exit Code: 1 Command Output (stderr): -- /usr/bin/ld.gold: error: