Re: [swift-dev] Adding a field to StrongRefCount class

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 12:56 AM, Jiho Choi via swift-dev > wrote: > I want to add a field to StrongRefCount class for some experiment, but the > build fails while building self-hosted 'swift-build'. I am using the version > 3.1.1. > > Does the shape of StrongRefCount

Re: [swift-dev] Metadata Representation

> On Sep 26, 2017, at 12:35 AM, Saleem Abdulrasool > wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:47 AM, John McCall > wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Joe Groff > > wrote: > >>

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 1. OSS - Swift ASAN - OS X (master) #293

This is from my changes. I think I know what the problem is, I’ll test a fix now. Slava > On Sep 25, 2017, at 9:38 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx [#293] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-ASAN-RA-osx/293/ >

Re: [swift-dev] Metadata Representation

On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:47 AM, John McCall wrote: > > On Sep 25, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Joe Groff wrote: > >> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:30 PM, John McCall wrote: > >>> On Sep 22, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool

Re: [swift-dev] Thoughts on a hypothetical "Multiple primary file" mode

Thank you, Jordan. Lots to mull over for me here. BTW, although it was I who mentioned "multiple primary files" today, it was not my idea. I was relaying what Graydon had mentioned. (Just to give credit where it's due.) - David > On Sep 25, 2017, at 3:45 PM, Jordan Rose

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - Swift Incremental RA - Ubuntu 14.04 - Long Test (master) #799

I don't think this is related to my commit -- I've just touched docs and llvm-cov. vedant > On Sep 25, 2017, at 5:51 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-14_04-long-test [#799] > > Build URL: >

[swift-dev] backporting clang patches from upstream?

Hi, I'd like to backport the following commit to swift-clang https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/commit/5c5aea8028aa58b347eaf3b552bc158a2a85ee18 as it fixes some problems with the freebsd build. What's the recommended workflow? Thanks, -- Davide ___

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] encodeEncodable/decodeDecodable

Hi Itai, Pull request is here , unfortunately tests are failing on Linux. I’m still trying to get Swift built on Linux so I can investigate (didn’t have any luck using the prebuilt binaries to build Foundation). Cheers, Luke > On

Re: [swift-dev] Metadata Representation

> On Sep 22, 2017, at 5:39 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool via swift-dev > wrote: > > Now, as it so happens, both PE and PE+ have limitations on the file size at > 4GiB. This means that we are guaranteed that the relative difference is > guaranteed to fit within 32-bits. This is

Re: [swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - Ubuntu 16.10 (master) #358

I reverted these commits a while ago. The bots are still catching up. - Doug > On Sep 25, 2017, at 3:43 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10 [#358] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-linux-ubuntu-16_10/358/ >

Re: [swift-dev] A constraint system / type variable question

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 18:23, Joe Groff wrote: > > > >> On Sep 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, David Zarzycki wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sep 25, 2017, at 14:37, Joe Groff wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:36 PM, Robert Widmann via

Re: [swift-dev] A constraint system / type variable question

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 1:04 PM, David Zarzycki wrote: > > > >> On Sep 25, 2017, at 14:37, Joe Groff wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:36 PM, Robert Widmann via swift-dev >>> wrote: >>> >>> Why is the arrow carrying the “Has

Re: [swift-corelibs-dev] encodeEncodable/decodeDecodable

Hi Luke, Thanks for putting this together! Do you mind putting that up as a [pull request](https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pulls) so we can review it more formally and run it through CI? — Itai On 22 Sep 2017, at 19:53, Luke Howard via swift-corelibs-dev wrote: Had a

Re: [swift-dev] A constraint system / type variable question

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 14:37, Joe Groff wrote: > > > >> On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:36 PM, Robert Widmann via swift-dev >> wrote: >> >> Why is the arrow carrying the “Has Value Semantics Bit” rather than it being >> part of a protocol composition on an

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] swift-lldb release branches

Does the swift testsuite work with the lldb you've built? The lang/swift directory will build a lot of swift binaries and debug them. If that's failing altogether, then we'll have to look at what's going wrong there, but we run the testsuite from the swift lldb on a couple of Ubuntu systems,

[swift-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: OSS - Swift Package - OS X (master) #355

Title: Report [FAILURE] oss-swift-package-osx [#355] Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-package-osx/355/ Project:oss-swift-package-osx Date of build:Mon, 25 Sep 2017 13:42:26 -0500 Build duration:53 min Identified problems:Compile Error: This build failed

Re: [swift-dev] Metadata Representation

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Joe Groff wrote: >> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:30 PM, John McCall wrote: >>> On Sep 22, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:28 PM, John McCall

Re: [swift-dev] libdispatch switched to CMake

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 11:28, Jordan Rose wrote: > > > >> On Sep 24, 2017, at 19:32, Saleem Abdulrasool > > wrote: >> >> On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:02 AM, David P Grove >

Re: [swift-dev] A constraint system / type variable question

> On Sep 23, 2017, at 10:36 PM, Robert Widmann via swift-dev > wrote: > > Why is the arrow carrying the “Has Value Semantics Bit” rather than it being > part of a protocol composition on an argument type, or a convention bit on > the parameter like ‘inout’? Value

Re: [swift-dev] libdispatch switched to CMake

> On Sep 24, 2017, at 19:32, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote: > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 5:02 AM, David P Grove > wrote: > With autotools, the first time libdispatch was built (for SourceKit), it just > did the C build of

Re: [swift-dev] Metadata Representation

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 10:28 AM, Jordan Rose wrote: > > > >> On Sep 25, 2017, at 09:24, Joe Groff via swift-dev > > wrote: >> >> >> >>> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:30 PM, John McCall >>

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - OS X (master) #193

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:05 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-lldb-incremental-osx [#193] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incremental-osx/193/ > > Project: oss-lldb-incremental-osx > Date of build:

Re: [swift-dev] Metadata Representation

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 1:28 PM, Jordan Rose wrote: >> On Sep 25, 2017, at 09:24, Joe Groff via swift-dev > > wrote: >>> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:30 PM, John McCall >> > wrote:

Re: [swift-dev] Metadata Representation

> On Sep 25, 2017, at 09:24, Joe Groff via swift-dev > wrote: > > > >> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:30 PM, John McCall wrote: >> >> >>> On Sep 22, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool >>> wrote: >>> >>> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at

Re: [swift-dev] Metadata Representation

> On Sep 24, 2017, at 10:30 PM, John McCall wrote: > > >> On Sep 22, 2017, at 8:39 PM, Saleem Abdulrasool >> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 10:28 PM, John McCall wrote: >> >>> On Sep 21, 2017, at 10:10 PM, Saleem

Re: [swift-dev] A constraint system / type variable question

Thanks John! I’ll find a workaround or just punt on this QoI work for now. Dave > On Sep 24, 2017, at 23:06, John McCall wrote: > >> On Sep 24, 2017, at 1:13 AM, David Zarzycki via swift-dev >> > wrote: >> Hi Robert, >> >>