I'd be interested in taking it but I have another ticket already, so if
someone else wants it they should take it.
Austin
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Dmitri Gribenko wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:27 PM, Jacob Bandes-Storch
> wrote:
> > What do you mean by "without copying the underlyin
What do you mean by "without copying the underlying collection"? Is this
specifically for the case where the AnySequence is wrapping a collection
(which is not always the case)?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via swift-dev <
swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
> It would require a propos
It would require a proposal and a review, but the implementation is
more challenging here than the API design. The proposal would be
trivial, just one extra API, if I'm imagining this correctly.
Dmitri
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Austin Zheng wrote:
> Would this require a review/proposal, s
Would this require a review/proposal, since it involves an API change?
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 2:08 PM, Dmitri Gribenko via swift-dev <
swift-dev@swift.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If someone looks for a starter project in the standard library with
> intermediate complexity (prior experience with Swift g
Hi,
If someone looks for a starter project in the standard library with
intermediate complexity (prior experience with Swift generics
required), here's one.
This is in the area of existential sequence and collection wrappers.
Upgrading AnyForwardCollection to AnyRandomAccessCollection works:
(s
