Re: [swift-dev] repl/test-repl-glibc.py Failure on Ubuntu

2016-04-15 Thread Joseph Bell via swift-dev
+Mishal, while Ryan et al are looking at the broken REPL, would it make sense to update the CI servers with the Python pexpect module so that the test-repl-glibc.py will fail the build? On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 10:19 AM, Ryan Lovelett wrote: > I've tried reverting c6121d56b19305cf59148d46af54c06b

Re: [swift-dev] repl/test-repl-glibc.py Failure on Ubuntu

2016-04-15 Thread Ryan Lovelett via swift-dev
I've tried reverting c6121d56b19305cf59148d46af54c06b771f3180 just to see if doing that will restore functionality to lldb/repl. Unfortunately too many things have changed in the build system since that commit for a revert to make sense anymore. Can anyone provide documentation/explain the mechan

Re: [swift-dev] repl/test-repl-glibc.py Failure on Ubuntu

2016-04-14 Thread Dmitri Gribenko via swift-dev
+Brian On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:46 PM, Ryan Lovelett via swift-dev wrote: > I've played around with `git bisect` and I think I've tracked it down to > this commit [1]. Which came from PR #1704 [2]. I've also updated the issue, > SR-1109, to include this information. > > c6121d56b19305cf59148d46a

Re: [swift-dev] repl/test-repl-glibc.py Failure on Ubuntu

2016-04-14 Thread Ryan Lovelett via swift-dev
I've played around with `git bisect` and I think I've tracked it down to this commit [1]. Which came from PR #1704 [2]. I've also updated the issue, SR-1109, to include this information. c6121d56b19305cf59148d46af54c06b771f3180 is the first bad commit commit c6121d56b19305cf59148d46af54c06b771f31

Re: [swift-dev] repl/test-repl-glibc.py Failure on Ubuntu

2016-04-14 Thread Jordan Rose via swift-dev
+swift-lldb-dev > On Apr 14, 2016, at 7:20 , Joseph Bell via swift-dev > wrote: > > Ryan, thanks. I've voted on SR-1109 and will add the steps I use to > reproduce as well. > > I think now its clear why the 14.04 and 15.10 packaging tests are passing, > and that's because they aren't runn

Re: [swift-dev] repl/test-repl-glibc.py Failure on Ubuntu

2016-04-14 Thread Joseph Bell via swift-dev
Ryan, thanks. I've voted on SR-1109 and will add the steps I use to reproduce as well. I think now its clear why the 14.04 and 15.10 packaging tests are passing, and that's because they aren't running the tests that leverage pexpect, if you look at the console log for the 14.04 test: https://ci.s

Re: [swift-dev] repl/test-repl-glibc.py Failure on Ubuntu

2016-04-14 Thread Ryan Lovelett via swift-dev
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016, at 09:17 AM, Joseph Bell via swift-dev wrote: > Howdy, > > I've mentioned this once before and didn't get any feedback; I thought > I'd give it one more shot. > > Has anyone out there tried building, from scratch, the Swift 3.0 > package on Ubuntu?  The compile, link, packagin

[swift-dev] repl/test-repl-glibc.py Failure on Ubuntu

2016-04-14 Thread Joseph Bell via swift-dev
Howdy, I've mentioned this once before and didn't get any feedback; I thought I'd give it one more shot. Has anyone out there tried building, from scratch, the Swift 3.0 package on Ubuntu? The compile, link, packaging steps all complete successfully, but then the repl/test-repl-glibc.py fails.