Re: [swift-dev] Emitted SIL does not parse

2017-04-06 Thread Ben Ng via swift-dev
Yep, here’s a gist. Ben Ng https://benng.me On Apr 6, 2017, 9:00 PM -0400, Michael Gottesman , wrote: > > > On Apr 6, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Ben Ng wrote: > > > > It doesn’t look like it: > > > > > swift (LLVM option parsing): Unknown command line argument > > > '-assume-parsing-unqualified-ownershi

Re: [swift-dev] Emitted SIL does not parse

2017-04-06 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
> On Apr 6, 2017, at 5:07 PM, Ben Ng wrote: > > It doesn’t look like it: > > swift (LLVM option parsing): Unknown command line argument > '-assume-parsing-unqualified-ownership-sil'. Try: 'swift (LLVM option > parsing) -help' I misunderstood what you said before (I thought you said that it

Re: [swift-dev] Emitted SIL does not parse

2017-04-06 Thread Ben Ng via swift-dev
It doesn’t look like it: > swift (LLVM option parsing): Unknown command line argument > '-assume-parsing-unqualified-ownership-sil'.  Try: 'swift (LLVM option > parsing) -help' Ben Ng https://benng.me On Apr 4, 2017, 11:37 PM -0400, Michael Gottesman , wrote: > I think it is an -Xllvm option.

Re: [swift-dev] Emitted SIL does not parse

2017-04-04 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
I think it is an -Xllvm option. > On Apr 4, 2017, at 7:41 PM, Ben Ng wrote: > > Do you mean like: > > $ swiftc -O moof.sil -o moof -Xfrontend > -assume-parsing-unqualified-ownership-sil > > It seems like the `-assume-parsing-unqualified-ownership-sil` argument isn’t > understood without the -

Re: [swift-dev] Emitted SIL does not parse

2017-04-04 Thread Ben Ng via swift-dev
Do you mean like: > $ swiftc -O moof.sil -o moof -Xfrontend > -assume-parsing-unqualified-ownership-sil It seems like the `-assume-parsing-unqualified-ownership-sil` argument isn’t understood without the -Xfrontend flag. The above command results in a different error: > Cannot construct Inlin

Re: [swift-dev] Emitted SIL does not parse

2017-04-03 Thread Michael Gottesman via swift-dev
> On Apr 3, 2017, at 7:55 PM, Ben Ng via swift-dev wrote: > > I see that SR-3774 already exists, > but that ticket was about declarations not appearing in the emitted SIL. > > I'm able to get declarations to appear with the -frontend flag, but the > emi