Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE 0192 - Non-Exhaustive Enums

2017-12-21 Thread Ash Furrow via swift-evolution
Furrow https://ashfurrow.com/ On December 21, 2017 at 1:55:40 PM, Jordan Rose (jordan_r...@apple.com) wrote: Thanks for your response, Ash. Comments inline. On Dec 20, 2017, at 11:49, Ash Furrow via swift-evolution <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: Proposal link:  https://github.com

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE 0192 - Non-Exhaustive Enums

2017-12-20 Thread Ash Furrow via swift-evolution
Proposal link:  https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0192-non-exhaustive-enums.md What is your evaluation of the proposal? -1. Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift? I’m afraid not. >From my perspective as a Swift user, this

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0087: Rename lazy to @lazy

2016-05-18 Thread Ash Furrow via swift-evolution
* What is your evaluation of the proposal? I’m -1 on this. The only motivation given for the proposal is: > Swift's rule for attribues/keywords is that keywords usually modify type of > variable; attributes do not. Chris Lattner has [refuted