Re: [swift-evolution] [Proposal] Random Unification

> On Dec 2, 2017, at 6:02 PM, Xiaodi Wu via swift-evolution > wrote: > > Instead, we ought to make clear to users both the features and the > limitations of this API, to encourage use where suitable and to discourage > use where unsuitable. I like that you're

Re: [swift-evolution] Figuring out what you get for free

> However, I find that I'm having trouble figuring out what I get for free when > I implement a protocol. In principle, I like conditional conformances and > synthesized implementation of protocol methods, but I find that they both > make it harder to figure out what I need to implement, and

Re: [swift-evolution] Revisiting SE-0110

Yes, in the sense that the grammar has a production that permits the tuple element name. But there aren't any examples that use labels

Re: [swift-evolution] Swift Evolution Status Page Now Available

t;> This looks great, thanks! >> >> SE-0080 was recently implemented by a contributor and will be available in >> Swift 4: >> >> https://github.com/apple/swift/pull/4314 >> >> Slava >> >>> On Jan 18, 2017, at 2:04 PM, Kyle Murray via sw

[swift-evolution] Swift Evolution Status Page Now Available

Hi everyone, We've just launched a new status page for keeping track of Swift Evolution proposals. See the announcement in a post on the swift.org blog . A few of the benefits to the new page are: