Re: [swift-evolution] A (better) Swift Equivalent For The Classical For-Loop With Numeric Scalars

Yes, thank you Dmitri, I think so too. Will come back to this later. TedvG ted van gaalen > On 19 Mar 2016, at 08:46, Dmitri Gribenko wrote: > > Hi Ted, > > Thank you for starting this thread. I agree that removing the C-style > for loop has degraded the readability

Re: [swift-evolution] A (better) Swift Equivalent For The Classical For-Loop With Numeric Scalars

Hello T.J. It will be an addition, not a change. The for- statement I will bring forward does not change the existing for-in... at all or any other language element. -TedvG > On 19 Mar 2016, at 00:55, T.J. Usiyan wrote: > > Please… *please* let this lie. > > I

Re: [swift-evolution] [Draft]: Introducing a striding(by:) method on 3.0 ranges

ah, you're right about that! somehow there was a doubly linked list in my head, sorry. TedvG > On 11 Apr 2016, at 11:20, Haravikk wrote: > > >>> On 10 Apr 2016, at 22:44, Ted F.A. van Gaalen via swift-evolution >>> wrote: >>> >>> Say

Re: [swift-evolution] multi-line string literals.

Hi Michael also inline > On 26 Apr 2016, at 22:05, Michael Peternell wrote: > > Comments inline. > >> Am 26.04.2016 um 15:32 schrieb Ted F.A. van Gaalen : >> >> Hi Michael >> >> What happens if a delimiter in this case: “”” >> occurs

Re: [swift-evolution] multi-line string literals.

hello, Have read all? conversations about this subject... Would you all be so kind to take a look at what I suggested and wrote appr. a week ago? (data lines) This is with using: \@ for verbatim as-is character data and \\ for character data with processing of \ escaped chars

Re: [swift-evolution] private & fileprivate

in 10-15 years compilers/interpreters are merged and update themselves as AI. so we can tell in human language what an app should do :o) @Jean: can you explain that about extensions in this context (oop) ? TedvG ted van gaalen > On 15 Oct 2016, at 21:44, Goffredo Marocchi