Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0129: Package Manager Test Naming Conventions

2016-07-23 Thread T.J. Usiyan via swift-evolution
* What is your evaluation of the proposal? + 1 * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change to Swift? Yes * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? Yes * If you have used other languages or libraries with a

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0129: Package Manager Test Naming Conventions

2016-07-22 Thread David Hart via swift-evolution
>* What is your evaluation of the proposal? I really like this proposal as it reduces the surprise factor while continuing to promote convention over configuration. It also mirrors the way people are often would like to name their test modules. >* Is the problem being addressed

Re: [swift-evolution] [Review] SE-0129: Package Manager Test Naming Conventions

2016-07-22 Thread Ankit Agarwal via swift-evolution
> * What is your evaluation of the proposal? > +1 to proposal. This will be a good change to make conventions more clearer and a step towards supporting test specific libraries. > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a > change to Swift? > Yes, the