Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

Not that I need to say this, but I’ll chime in anyway with a big +1 to what Chris said. =) Fortunately, the current code owners for swift-corelibs-foundation are the same people that work on Foundation for all of our other platforms. That means we’re in a great position to make Foundation

Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

Speaking of release cadence, do you think that Swift could transition to the release train model (i.e., staged release, beta, and nightly) once source and ABI compatibility are both established? That would allow a quicker cadence and more testing of new library and language features. It's seems to

Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

On Jan 1, 2016, at 12:56 PM, Trent Nadeau wrote: > Speaking of release cadence, do you think that Swift could transition to the > release train model (i.e., staged release, beta, and nightly) once source and > ABI compatibility are both established? That would allow a

Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

Brilliant. Makes sense and seems to be a best-of-both-worlds approach. - Rod On 2 Jan 2016, at 3:16 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: >>> On Jan 1, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Rod Brown wrote: >>> Thanks Chris. I want to figure out what the guiding principles are

Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

Please see response inline - Rod > On 2 Jan 2016, at 9:13 AM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution > wrote: > > Thanks Chris. I want to figure out what the guiding principles are before I > blow any further proposal-capital. This gives me a good place to start >

Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

Thanks Chris. I want to figure out what the guiding principles are before I blow any further proposal-capital. This gives me a good place to start chewing on some thoughts. In particular, I'm considering two scenarios. First, are things that seem unnaturally split between both places, such as

Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

My understanding is that Foundation closely maps to the ObjC Foundation framework. Félix > Le 31 déc. 2015 à 17:54:39, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution > a écrit : > > Under what criteria should we propose moving items into the standard library > and out from the

Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

On Dec 31, 2015, at 2:54 PM, Erica Sadun via swift-evolution wrote: > Under what criteria should we propose moving items into the standard library > and out from the standard library into Swift Foundation? Or will these things > eventually merge and become one grand

Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

On Jan 1, 2016, at 2:13 PM, Erica Sadun wrote: > Thanks Chris. I want to figure out what the guiding principles are before I > blow any further proposal-capital. This gives me a good place to start > chewing on some thoughts. In particular, I'm considering two scenarios.

Re: [swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

> On Jan 1, 2016, at 3:32 PM, Rod Brown wrote: >> Thanks Chris. I want to figure out what the guiding principles are before I >> blow any further proposal-capital. This gives me a good place to start >> chewing on some thoughts. In particular, I'm considering two

[swift-evolution] Philosophy question: Foundation and Standard Library

Under what criteria should we propose moving items into the standard library and out from the standard library into Swift Foundation? Or will these things eventually merge and become one grand unified module sometime in the distant future? Thanks, -- E