It sounds like they were a joy to handle under the hood... yikes ;).
Sent from my iPhone
> On 20 Sep 2016, at 16:42, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 3:36 AM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution
>>
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 5:42 AM, Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
>
>> On Sep 20, 2016, at 3:36 AM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution
>> wrote:
>>
>> This is probably something additional and it might already have been
>>
I agree, no obvious win to revisiting, best to keep source compatibility.
On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:43 Douglas Gregor via swift-evolution <
swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 3:36 AM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution <
> swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote:
>
> This is
> On Sep 20, 2016, at 3:36 AM, Adrian Zubarev via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
> This is probably something additional and it might already have been
> discussed here somewhere, I apologize if I missed that talk.
>
> The rule for parameter labels on functions was
This is probably something additional and it might already have been discussed
here somewhere, I apologize if I missed that talk.
The rule for parameter labels on functions was fixed in Swift, but now it kinda
feels odd to have a different pair of rules for subscripts (at least it does
feel