on Wed Sep 21 2016, Benjamin Spratling wrote:
> Howdy,
> As I understand it, In Swift 3, a lack of encapsulation is testable,
> but specific keywords to protect a designed encapsulation can’t be
> introspected, and thus encapsulation is fragile, i.e. not protectable
> by unit tests.
>
> For inst
Howdy,
As I understand it, In Swift 3, a lack of encapsulation is testable, but
specific keywords to protect a designed encapsulation can’t be introspected,
and thus encapsulation is fragile, i.e. not protectable by unit tests.
For instance, we can write unit-tests that determine if a member's a
