> On Oct 20, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Haravikk via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
>
>> On 20 Oct 2016, at 15:51, Martin Waitz via swift-evolution
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>>> It's just that a common data type wasting almost half the space seems
> On 20 Oct 2016, at 15:51, Martin Waitz via swift-evolution
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>> It's just that a common data type wasting almost half the space seems
>> inefficient. I guess this is also the reason why they didn't adopt optional
>> integers widely in stdlib.
Hello,
It's just that a common data type wasting almost half the space seems
inefficient. I guess this is also the reason why they didn't adopt
optional integers widely in stdlib.
When someone is really interested in fitting an optional integer into
one machine word,
then the best way would