Re: [swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review] SE-0144: Allow Single Dollar Sign as a Valid Identifier

2016-10-19 Thread Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution
> On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > > https://github.com/apple/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0144-allow-single-dollar-sign-as-valid-identifier.md > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? I know this is cutting against the grain, but I'm in favor. I

Re: [swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review] SE-0144: Allow Single Dollar Sign as a Valid Identifier

2016-10-16 Thread Fons Rademakers via swift-evolution
> > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? -1 > * Is the problem being addressed significant enough to warrant a change > to Swift? no > * Does this proposal fit well with the feel and direction of Swift? no > * If you have used other languages or libraries with

Re: [swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review] SE-0144: Allow Single Dollar Sign as a Valid Identifier

2016-10-14 Thread Kevin Ballard via swift-evolution
On Fri, Oct 14, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > * What is your evaluation of the proposal? -1. I agree with the reasons for removal, and do not consider the existence of a single library that depends on undocumented behavior to be sufficient reason for this change. > * How

Re: [swift-evolution] [swift-evolution-announce] [Review] SE-0144: Allow Single Dollar Sign as a Valid Identifier

2016-10-14 Thread Hooman Mehr via swift-evolution
+1. I am in favor of keeping and documenting single dollar sign as a valid identifier. I personally find it very convenient to have it as a valid identifier, although I don’t use Dollar library. > On Oct 14, 2016, at 12:59 PM, Chris Lattner wrote: > > Hello Swift community, > > The review of