Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - Ubuntu 15.10 (master) #3111

2016-04-14 Thread Arnold Schwaighofer via swift-lldb-dev
Failures unrelated to my commit. There are similar failures in #3109: https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incremental-linux-ubuntu-15_10/3109/ > On Apr 13, 2016, at 9:44 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-lldb-incremental-linux-ubuntu-15_10 [#3111] > > Build URL: > https://ci.s

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - Ubuntu 15.10 (master) #4361

2016-06-09 Thread Arnold Schwaighofer via swift-lldb-dev
From what I can tell this still looks like fallout from Slava’s ? changes: Command invoked: /usr/bin/python /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-lldb-incremental-linux-ubuntu-15_10/lldb/test/dotest.py --executable /home/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-lldb-incremental-linux-ubuntu-15_10/Ninja-

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - Ubuntu 14.04 (master) #4648

2016-07-26 Thread Arnold Schwaighofer via swift-lldb-dev
Spurious. Recovered in the follow-up build. https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incremental-linux-ubuntu-14_04/4649/ > On Jul 26, 2016, at 8:18 AM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-lldb-incremental-linux-ubuntu-14_04 [#4648] > > Build URL: > https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incre

[swift-lldb-dev] Support for the Swift calling convention in lldb

2016-10-13 Thread Arnold Schwaighofer via swift-lldb-dev
Hi LLDB team, as part of the ABI work for this year we would like to adopt the swift calling convention. I am working on the swift/llvm side of this. Adopt the new Swift calling convention The swift calling convention “swiftcc” together with the “swifterror” and “swiftself” attribute will ch

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] Support for the Swift calling convention in lldb

2016-10-13 Thread Arnold Schwaighofer via swift-lldb-dev
> On Oct 13, 2016, at 12:47 PM, Todd Fiala wrote: > > e identify C/C++ code that was using this calling convention? I think, llvm would have to mark such functions with a DWARF entry? I don’t know how much DWARF info generated by a clang that supports swiftcc would shield an older lldb from h

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] Support for the Swift calling convention in lldb

2016-10-14 Thread Arnold Schwaighofer via swift-lldb-dev
No, this is not the case. Objective-C method thunks use the _T prefix and follow the c calling convention. > On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:10 PM, Adrian Prantl wrote: > > My understanding was that once Swift switches to the new calling convention, > every function in the Swift namespace (^_T.*) would

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - OS X (master) #456

2017-11-30 Thread Arnold Schwaighofer via swift-lldb-dev
Swift CI: expression_command/save_jit_objects/TestSaveJITObjects.py fails > On Nov 30, 2017, at 9:42 AM, Pavel Yaskevich wrote: > > It doesn’t look like it could be caused by my changes in type-checker: > > AssertionError: False is not True : No locations found for source breakpoint: > "brea