Re: [swift-lldb-dev] Support for the Swift calling convention in lldb

2016-10-13 Thread Jason Molenda via swift-lldb-dev
> On Oct 13, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Todd Fiala via swift-lldb-dev > wrote: > I’m not entirely sure of all the places that care. > > * Possibly the unwinder, although that might not care since it needs to > handle hand-rolled assembly and everything in between. Jason could say more > here. Havi

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - OS X (master) #4866

2016-11-14 Thread Jason Molenda via swift-lldb-dev
This is me. > On Nov 14, 2016, at 8:09 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > [FAILURE] oss-lldb-incremental-osx [#4866] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incremental-osx/4866/ > Project: oss-lldb-incremental-osx > Date of build:Mon, 14 Nov 2016 19:35:52 -0800 > Build

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - Ubuntu 16.04 (master) #2239

2017-04-17 Thread Jason Molenda via swift-lldb-dev
I think I'm supposed to xfail those on linux; they fail on the swift.org bots periodically, something like a hypervisor bug? I can't remember what clears it out from the bots, but it's something specific to them. > On Apr 17, 2017, at 4:03 PM, Adrian Prantl wrote: > > It looks like all watchp

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - OS X (master) #5761

2017-07-07 Thread Jason Molenda via swift-lldb-dev
This was mine, fix pushed. > On Jul 7, 2017, at 6:58 PM, no-re...@swift.org wrote: > > New issue found! > > [FAILURE] oss-lldb-incremental-osx [#5761] > > Build URL:https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-lldb-incremental-osx/5761/ > Project: oss-lldb-incremental-osx > Date of build:Fri,

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - OS X (master) #371

2017-11-09 Thread Jason Molenda via swift-lldb-dev
> On Nov 9, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Pavel Yaskevich via swift-lldb-dev > wrote: > > > >> On Nov 9, 2017, at 2:34 PM, Jim Ingham wrote: >> >> Yes, I can reproduce the failure locally. I don't build lldb quite the way >> you do, I just checkout the lldb branch in question (I'm using stable): >>

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Failure: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - OS X (master) #371

2017-11-09 Thread Jason Molenda via swift-lldb-dev
Once we're outside of the debug information and assembly instructions, I'm not useful. :) The only difference between these two source files is the size of the struct in main2.swift is larger (has a float member) than main1.swift; there's quite a few additional instructions after the init() cal

Re: [swift-lldb-dev] [Swift CI] Build Still Failing: 0. OSS - LLDB Incremental - OS X (master) #552

2017-12-20 Thread Jason Molenda via swift-lldb-dev
Adrian is. [SwiftCI2Internal] [lldb-4.1-tools_RA] TestSwiftPOUninitialized.py FAILED > On Dec 20, 2017, at 8:03 PM, Michael Ilseman wrote: > > Jason, are you tracking this failure? > > >> On Dec 20, 2017, at 4:08 PM, Arnold Schwaighofer >> wrote: >> >> Not really a new issue? >> >> Fir