Hi Alexandr,
Is the fully scaling code noticeably slower than the regular code? Is there a reason to test and only use it
conditionally? It shouldn't be a lot of overhead considering everything else that goes on during a repaint. Some of
the set/unset of attributes could also be optimized
Hi, Alexandr.
Can you please provide some standalone small example, which emulates
this artifacts via java2d API. (The pattern which we use in
RepainManager). It will help to understand the problem.
On 06.10.16 20:07, Alexandr Scherbatiy wrote:
Hello,
Could you review the fix:
bug:
Hello,
Could you review the fix:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8162350
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~alexsch/8162350/webrev.00
The fix uses the solution suggest by Jim in the email:
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/2d-dev/2016-October/007737.html
To draw to
Hello,
Please review fix for JDK9:
bug: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8164321
webrev: http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~ssadetsky/8164321/webrev.00/
The issue is caused by concurrent XLib access form FX and AWT toolkit
threads in case of GTK3. To fix the issue wrapping by