On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:52:08 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> This is the last part of Post JEP 411 refactoring that makes
> `@SuppressWarnings("removal")` more fine grained. This fix deals with all
> client libs annotations that cover more than 10K bytes of code.
After the requested change to the
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:52:08 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> This is the last part of Post JEP 411 refactoring that makes
> `@SuppressWarnings("removal")` more fine grained. This fix deals with all
> client libs annotations that cover more than 10K bytes of code.
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:39:56 GMT, Vest
wrote:
>> This is the last part of Post JEP 411 refactoring that makes
>> `@SuppressWarnings("removal")` more fine grained. This fix deals with all
>> client libs annotations that cover more than 10K bytes of code.
>
>
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 21:39:56 GMT, Vest
wrote:
>> This is the last part of Post JEP 411 refactoring that makes
>> `@SuppressWarnings("removal")` more fine grained. This fix deals with all
>> client libs annotations that cover more than 10K bytes of code.
>
>
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021 20:52:08 GMT, Weijun Wang wrote:
> This is the last part of Post JEP 411 refactoring that makes
> `@SuppressWarnings("removal")` more fine grained. This fix deals with all
> client libs annotations that cover more than 10K bytes of code.
This is the last part of Post JEP 411 refactoring that makes
`@SuppressWarnings("removal")` more fine grained. This fix deals with all
client libs annotations that covers more than 10K bytes of code.
-
Commit messages:
- 8270859: Post JEP 411 refactoring: client libs with maximum
