Hi Sergey,
Could you approve this webrev as per our conversation?
@All,
I need one more review for pushing.
Thanks,
Krishna
From: Krishna Addepalli
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2018 6:53 PM
To: swing-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: RE: [11] RFR:JDK-8176359: Frame#setMaximizedbounds n
Hi, Phil.
The new webrev:
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~serb/8201552/webrev.03/
I have checked why validation of the component is necessary, when the
"ancestor" is changed (I removed it, but the new validation on GC change
null->non-null is equivalent).
Such validation is used as a last chance
2336 var newGC = (GraphicsConfiguration) oldValue; 2337 var oldGC =
(GraphicsConfiguration) newValue; 2338 var newTx = newGC != null ?
newGC.getDefaultTransform() : null;
2339 var oldTx = oldGC != null ? oldGC.getDefaultTransform() : null;
2340 return !Objects.equals(newTx, oldTx); var ?? I supp
On 28/06/2018 14:20, Phil Race wrote:
2336 var newGC = (GraphicsConfiguration) oldValue; 2337 var oldGC =
(GraphicsConfiguration) newValue; 2338 var newTx = newGC != null ?
newGC.getDefaultTransform() : null;
2339 var oldTx = oldGC != null ? oldGC.getDefaultTransform() : null;
2340 return !Obje
On 6/28/2018 3:14 PM, Sergey Bylokhov wrote:
On 28/06/2018 14:20, Phil Race wrote:
2336 var newGC = (GraphicsConfiguration) oldValue; 2337 var oldGC =
(GraphicsConfiguration) newValue; 2338 var newTx = newGC != null ?
newGC.getDefaultTransform() : null;
2339 var oldTx = oldGC != null ? oldGC.g
